Display:
"I'm convinced that they had the science of fermentation under control and were purposely producing the drug."

Fermentation under control ... fine. Purposely producing the drug (?)... something they had NO idea existed, in fact, they had no IDEA what EXISTED meant ...? Dear Mr. Scientist: Stick to your lab, do your analysis work, and then STFU.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 07:32:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Once he moves away from the physical anthropology and what can be reasonably inferred from that he is speculating. These people may have been aware of the healing effects of their beer and considered it a grace from their gods.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 10:44:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It was the chemist, Mark Nelson, who works for pharma, who was convinced they were consciously brewing the beer for its medicinal value. He was the one who had the apparatus to analyze the bones. The anthropologist, George Armelagos, undoubtedly had control over what went into the paper, but not over what came out of his chemist co-author's mouth. Anthropologists spend years learning what can and cannot be reasonably inferred about human behavior and thought. Medical chemists do not.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 10:55:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series