Display:
 ECONOMY & FINANCE 


The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 01:02:11 PM EST
FT.com / Capital Markets - Eurozone governments to step up borrowing in September

The eurozone debt crisis is about to enter a dangerous phase as governments prepare to step up borrowing in the capital markets to fund their faltering economies.

Eurozone governments will attempt to issue double the amount of debt this month compared with August, with some strategists warning that some of the weaker economies could fail to raise the amount of money they need.

Spain, Portugal and Ireland, the so-called peripheral eurozone economies, are considered most in danger of being shunned by investors as worries persist over the health of their banks and economies. Greece is no longer a concern as it has emergency loans to cover its funding for the next two years.

Padhraic Garvey, head of rates strategy for developed markets at ING Financial Markets, said: "We are heading into a critical period as the chances rise that a government may fail to raise the money it needs.



The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 01:08:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
In struggling housing market, buyers and sellers are out of sync

Across the Washington region and around the country, the expectations of buyers and sellers are out of whack, thwarting deals that could potentially lift the U.S. housing sector from its long funk. The nascent rebirth of the market earlier this year proved to be a mirage.

Despite record-low interest rates, many would-be buyers are retrenching, hamstrung by meager growth in their wages, gripped by fears over the possibility of losing their jobs or another recession. Sales of existing homes plunged in July to the lowest level in more than a decade, and sales of new homes were slower than at any time since the government started tracking the data in 1963. The results were far worse than some of the most pessimistic economists had expected and added to the doubts nagging at Wright and other prospective buyers, even in areas such as Washington that have been relatively insulated from the housing bust.

There are now so many homes for sale and so few selling that, at the current sales pace, it would take over a year to clear the existing inventory on the U.S. market. That is more than double the time required in a healthy market and up significantly just since June.

"That's a powerful cocktail working against the housing recovery," said Mike Larson, an analyst at Weiss Research. "There's going to be a long-lasting psychological hesitancy for ordinary buyers to believe again in the dream of building wealth through homeownership."



The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 01:14:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Too Early to `Declare Victory' as Housing Revives, Donovan Says - Bloomberg

Home sales, showing new signs of life two years after the credit crunch drove down home prices, must gain more ground before policy makers can "declare victory," Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said.

"It is too early to certainly declare victory," Donovan said in an interview for Bloomberg Television's "Political Capital with Al Hunt," airing this weekend. He said prices picked up over the last year and Americans added $1.1 trillion in equity to their homes.

An index of pending home sales rose an unexpected 5.2 percent in July, the National Association of Realtors reported Sept. 2, after seasonally adjusted pending sales dropped 2.8 percent in June and almost 30 percent in May. July 2010 was down more than 19 percent from a year ago.



The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 01:47:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
No Money Down Mortgages, Small Programs, Creep Back - NYTimes.com

MILWAUKEE -- When the housing bubble burst, one of the culprits, economists agreed, was exotic mortgages, including those that required little or no money down.

But on a recent evening, Matthew and Hannah Middlebrooke stood in their new $115,000 three-bedroom ranch house here, which Mr. Middlebrooke bought in June with just $1,000 down.

Because he also received a grant to cover closing costs and insurance, the check he wrote at the closing was for 67 cents.

[...]

Although home foreclosures are again expected to top two million this year, Fannie Mae, the lending giant that required a government takeover, is creeping back into the market for mortgages with no down payment.



The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
by dvx (dvx.clt ät gmail dotcom) on Sun Sep 5th, 2010 at 01:56:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
There's going to be a long-lasting psychological hesitancy for ordinary buyers to believe again in the dream of building wealth through homeownership."

I'll say this one final time and then, I promise, I'll shut up.

The idea of "...building wealth through homeownership." is relatively new; thirty years ago my Ph.D. Prof in Davis owned 14 houses, 12 of which he rented, but that was not the buy and flip days. What I tell my students is, once you have a stable job (best bet ... work for the Fed. Govt.) stop flushing money down the toilet in the form of rent cheques and get a place you can own/afford.

That's it. Sorry to bother you.


In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.

by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 04:53:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't think the best advice you can give to young people today is to rush getting into debt peonage for an overpriced piece of real estate.

Ten years ago, when the housing prices were much lower than they are now (and the rents comparatively higher), you certainly could make the case. Nowadays, you'd better take a cold hard look at the numbers before deciding whether this is the best use of your money.

Your mileage may vary of course, depending on the local situation in your country/region, house price trends, rental costs, renters protection (or the lack thereof)...

That's where the rub is: home ownership as a social status more than a rational financial decision is so ingrained in our social consciousness that we don't even pause for a thought, so convinced we are that "renting is throwing money down the drain". That's the cornerstone of the pwn3rship society touted by W and his European ilks.

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.

by Bernard on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 06:05:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
All true. Please notice my priorities:

  1. Get a stable job/income.
  2. Decide what you can afford for a house.
  3. Find a house in your affordability range bearing in  mind location, your future plans, etc.

Sorry but, other than keeping you off the streets and making someone else wealthy, "renting is throwing money down the drain" is still correct IMHO.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 06:19:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Paying a mortgage which is mostly composed of interests the first year is also "throwing money down the drain" and "making someone else wealthy", just not the same kind of people...

If you stay in your house 10, 20 years or more, buying it is certainly the best plan (unless exceptional circumstances such as Detroit or Baltimore). Less than 10 years? Better do the numbers before: closing costs, property taxes, maintenance works... In many places (not Sacramento, though according to the NYT), you'll only get ahead if your house appreciates several percent every year. Who can be sure of that?

Younger people are more likely to be moving to another place in less than 10 years: better think twice before getting shackled. Again: your mileage may vary, depending on the market and regulation in your country/region.


Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.

by Bernard on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 07:43:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't find your recommendations and mine to be necessarily mutually exclusive. I will combine both.

In the end, might makes right. Nothing has changed since the caveman.
by THE Twank (yatta blah blah @ blah.com) on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 12:16:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Edward Schumacher-Matos - How illegal immigrants are helping Social Security
The contributions by unauthorized immigrants to Social Security -- essentially, to the retirement income of everyday Americans -- are much larger than previously known, raising questions about the efforts in many states and among Republicans in Congress to force these workers out.

The kicker:

Adding to the Social Security irony is that the restrictionists are mostly older or retired whites from longtime American families. The very people, in other words, who benefit most from the Social Security payments by unauthorized immigrants.

Surprised?

The decline in illegal immigration, plus tighter workplace enforcement, means that contributions from the unauthorized will decrease. But as Goss notes, they remain, because of larger families, a positive contributing factor to Social Security solvency.

Somebody ought to say thank you.

(Don't hold your breath, though)

Europeans think a hundred miles is a long way. Americans think a hundred years is a long time.

by Bernard on Mon Sep 6th, 2010 at 07:24:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series