The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The incidence of taxation is an expression of political power. If you have the political power to move to a monetary system that requires the state to collect and/or tax away a greater proportion of the rental value land than it does today, then you also have the political power to just tax landowners (unless you wish to assume that landowners are stupid - for which there may be a case to be made).
And if you do have the power to tax landowners, then taxing them will be superior to your proposal, because your scheme will not break down gracefully if power swings back to the landholders: A reprivatisation of the land will allow landholders to hold the monetary system hostage until you go off the land standard. That encourages a positive feedback loop going in the wrong direction, to borrow one of ATinNM's stock phrases.
You're basically proposing a fiat system in a cheap tuxedo and with an open back door for takeover by landholders as well as banksters.
Do. Not. Want.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by DoDo - Dec 21 2 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 4 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 63 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 20 5 comments
by gmoke - Dec 2 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 18 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 26 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by DoDo - Dec 212 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 205 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 171 comment
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 1563 comments
by das monde - Dec 1418 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments