The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That may be the case for Hong Kong, but their system is defective in many ways: it just happens to monetise (indirectly via the government as intermediary) far more land value than virtually anyone else.
Which I think is a Good Thing tax-wise.
What I am proposing is essentially a loan direct to the land, not to the owner.
The difference is that in this loan, no money is paid for the use of money, but rather, money is being paid for the use of the capital invested in a particular location, both publicly and privately.
I can demonstrate conclusively that - as should be intuitively obvious - a funding cost that does not include compound interest is lower than one which does.
Also, I think that a currency redeemable in payment for such a rental payment would be generally fungible in a location.
"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed"
by joelado - Oct 20 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19 26 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 16 7 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 14 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 5 128 comments
by DoDo - Oct 2 10 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27 9 comments
by joelado - Oct 2011 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1926 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 167 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 141 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 5128 comments
by DoDo - Oct 210 comments
by gmoke - Sep 279 comments