The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That may be the case for Hong Kong, but their system is defective in many ways: it just happens to monetise (indirectly via the government as intermediary) far more land value than virtually anyone else.
Which I think is a Good Thing tax-wise.
What I am proposing is essentially a loan direct to the land, not to the owner.
The difference is that in this loan, no money is paid for the use of money, but rather, money is being paid for the use of the capital invested in a particular location, both publicly and privately.
I can demonstrate conclusively that - as should be intuitively obvious - a funding cost that does not include compound interest is lower than one which does.
Also, I think that a currency redeemable in payment for such a rental payment would be generally fungible in a location.
"The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed"
by Cyrille - Apr 18 19 comments
by DoDo - Apr 19 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Apr 18 7 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 12 30 comments
by DoDo - Apr 6 39 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 8 6 comments
by Oui - Apr 16 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 31 10 comments
by DoDo - Apr 193 comments
by ARGeezer - Apr 187 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 1819 comments
by Oui - Apr 163 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 1230 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 86 comments
by DoDo - Apr 639 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3158 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 3110 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 2910 comments
by DoDo - Mar 279 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 275 comments