The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If a state is actually going to redeem currency with real estate, there either has to be enough to go around to cover broad redemption, or redemption needs narrowed down, probably a lot. If you go with a narrow system, a few holders would have real redemption rights, subject to use and commons rights held by everyone else. Hence my feudalism reference. If you go with broad redemption, you need a lot of fractional interests and derivative instruments that will be traded around but that are ultimately limited because the amount of real estate is limited (Even the US ran out of land to give away, and it didn't really take that long.). Hence my fear of a bubble, especially when the derivatives get loose and it all starts going the same way mortgages did.
My other concern with broad redemption is that it will become narrow, which seems to be the tendency. Mere mortals get shoved out by ever bigger players. Witness the banking industry and securities markets, or on the real estate side, tribal lands here in the US after P.L. 280 and termination policies or council housing in the UK after Thatcher.
by afew - Oct 31 14 comments
by gmoke - Oct 28 10 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 61 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Oct 31 1 comment
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by afew - Oct 3114 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Oct 311 comment
by gmoke - Oct 2810 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2061 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments