The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If a state is actually going to redeem currency with real estate, there either has to be enough to go around to cover broad redemption, or redemption needs narrowed down, probably a lot. If you go with a narrow system, a few holders would have real redemption rights, subject to use and commons rights held by everyone else. Hence my feudalism reference. If you go with broad redemption, you need a lot of fractional interests and derivative instruments that will be traded around but that are ultimately limited because the amount of real estate is limited (Even the US ran out of land to give away, and it didn't really take that long.). Hence my fear of a bubble, especially when the derivatives get loose and it all starts going the same way mortgages did.
My other concern with broad redemption is that it will become narrow, which seems to be the tendency. Mere mortals get shoved out by ever bigger players. Witness the banking industry and securities markets, or on the real estate side, tribal lands here in the US after P.L. 280 and termination policies or council housing in the UK after Thatcher.
by afew - Jan 25 2 comments
by melo - Jan 23 4 comments
by gmoke - Jan 15 5 comments
by DoDo - Jan 20 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16 104 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 1 65 comments
by afew - Jan 5 44 comments
by rifek - Jan 5 9 comments
by afew - Jan 252 comments
by melo - Jan 234 comments
by DoDo - Jan 204 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16104 comments
by gmoke - Jan 155 comments
by afew - Jan 544 comments
by rifek - Jan 59 comments
by DoDo - Jan 25 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 165 comments
by melo - Dec 316 comments
by Metatone - Dec 3129 comments
by rz - Dec 2956 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 2755 comments
by das monde - Dec 2726 comments