Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
In this case, the ECB should just end lending to Irish banks.

What exactly are you propagating here? Austrian economics?

by IM on Sat Feb 5th, 2011 at 06:32:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, the ECB should not "just end lending to Irish banks."

The ECB should resolve those banks which are insolvent. That means reimbursing their depositors, up to the limit of the deposit guarantee (say, € 20.000), and then attempting to recover whatever value can be recovered from their assets. Any value that can be recovered from their assets beyond what is needed to cover depositors is then paid out to their creditors, in order of seniority. The remaining creditors get to fuck off and die.

The ECB should lend at the discount window to those banks which are solvent. That does not involve taking on crap collateral. If the bank is not able to post collateral that is not crap, then it isn't solvent and should be resolved.

The Irish state should spend money in order to support demand and restore full employment. The ECB should support this policy by purchasing all newly issued Irish bonds at the ECB's policy rate of 1 %.

The Irish state should attempt to claw back the money that was unjustly paid out to the creditors of insolvent banks. To the extent that money was ever actually paid, this is going to be hard. But I'm betting that most of that money was never actually paid, in the sense of being moved from one reserve account at the ECB to another. I'm betting that most of the money "paid out" in the Irish bank bailout was actually just the Irish government buying the debts of Irish banks using newly issued Irish government bonds. In which case it is a matter of supreme simplicity to declare those bonds void. Bonds are numbered and notarised, after all.

The Irish state should not, under any circumstance, engage in austerity. Not now, not ever.

But what is actually happening is that the ECB is telling the Irish government that the ECB will not support a sane Irish recovery policy, because the ECB is concerned about the Irish national debt. Instead, the ECB will only refinance Ireland's existing national debt, and only if Ireland engages in certifiably insane macroeconomic policies.

The logical response to that - indeed the only sane response - is to say "well then, fuck the national debt." If there is no national debt, then there is no need to refinance, and then the ECB cannot impose its austerity insanity.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Feb 5th, 2011 at 06:49:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That actually makes some sense. There is a little problem, though: The ECB doesn't have the legal authority to resolve anything.

That is the duty -please don't laugh - of the Irish bank regulators.

In other word of the people who allowed this whole problem to happen.

But instead of laying the problem at the foot of the Irish authorities, you like to blame others.

by IM on Sat Feb 5th, 2011 at 07:02:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That excuses the ECB from the first paragraph. It does not excuse the ECB from anything else on that laundry list of indictments of poor performance.

In fact, it does not even excuse the ECB from the first paragraph. Because the ECB has been lobbying for the banks to not be resolved since the first day of this crisis. The ECB decided to be a part of the problem, where it could have been a part of the solution.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Sat Feb 5th, 2011 at 07:14:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]


Top Diaries

Mogg the Moggie

by Frank Schnittger - Jun 15

Boris the Beast

by Frank Schnittger - Jun 11

Global Community Gathers in Russia

by Oui - Jun 14

A Perfect Storm

by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1

Fake America In 3 Tweets

by Oui - Jun 3

Occasional Series