The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
There also seems to be a value dissonance. I like my regional public bank and my regional/local saving bank. I think the are a valuable part of the German banking system and should be defended against the ravaging neoliberalism. As should be the equivalent parts of the banking system of other European countries. (And the state bank of North Dakota)
And you do discriminate against other Europeans:
A clear hierarchy of needs against foreigners.
There also seems to be a value dissonance. I like my regional public bank and my regional/local saving bank. I think the are a valuable part of the German banking system and should be defended against the ravaging neoliberalism.
Well, yeah. If there's enough money to go around to keep banks from losing their shirts, then local banks and state-owned banks should be at the front of the queue.
But the fact is that if a bank becomes insolvent, there are established procedures to resolve that situation without any major loss for the real economy. The bank's management is decapitated, the assets sold off, and its shareholders and unsecured creditors get to take a haircut. But the economic function - credit analysis, information gathering, transaction clearing and money creation - will still be carried on during and after a bankruptcy.
When a manufacturing firm goes bankrupt, on the other hand, there is a significant risk that it is going to be disassembled and sold as scrap. Which destroys its economic function. And when a pension fund is insolvent, retirees get shafted. So all in all, if you have to shaft someone it's better for everyone, except the shareholders and management, that you shaft a bank than a manufacturing firm.
And the proportion of banks that are simply evil is arguably higher than the proportion of manufacturing firms that are simply evil.
And you do discriminate against other Europeans
Yes, because foreigners have another safety net.
In the best of all possible worlds, the EU would come together and make a list of firms and individuals who needed to be bailed out for the common good, and another list of firms and individuals who need to go whistle for their money. And then the EU would, collectively, bail out the people who needed to be bailed out.
In the world we actually have, the EU is not going to bail out the Irish retirees. And while the German government might bail out German retirees, it isn't going to bail out Irish retirees. So shafting the foreigners in preference to the Irish is the only way the Irish government can incentivise other governments to lend material support to a rescue operation that could ensure that nobody had to be shafted (except the hedge funds).
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Metatone - Jun 29 40 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 28 32 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Jun 28 19 comments
by DoDo - Jun 23 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 20 352 comments
by melvin - Jun 15 60 comments
by gmoke - Jun 23 3 comments
by DoDo - Jun 21 4 comments
by Metatone - Jun 2940 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Jun 2819 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2832 comments
by das monde - Jun 2618 comments
by DoDo - Jun 2322 comments
by gmoke - Jun 233 comments
by DoDo - Jun 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 20352 comments
by melvin - Jun 1560 comments