The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The core is the long oval on top, the containment around it, the two 'legs' are the cross section of the torus in which steam is pumped into water, and apparently the venting is from there. On the right, in the bottom image, you see Fukushima Daiichi in red and Fukushima Daini in white. Above it, a drawing of Fukushima Daiichi; the top two squares are No. 5 and 6, then the first red one os No. 1, next to it No. 2 which is next to get seawater, then the second red is No. 3. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Fukushima Nuclear Accident - a simple and accurate explanation « BraveNewClimate
福島原発事故-簡潔で正確な 5299;説:(東京大学エンジニアリン 2464;在学生の翻訳) (thanks to Shota Yamanaka for translation) Twitter updates: @BraveNewClimate New 14 March: Updates and additional Q&A information here and Technical details here ------------- Along with reliable sources such as the IAEA and WNN updates, there is an incredible amount of misinformation and hyperbole flying around the internet and media right now about the Fukushima nuclear reactor situation. In the BNC post Discussion Thread - Japanese nuclear reactors and the 11 March 2011 earthquake (and in the many comments that attend the top post), a lot of technical detail is provided, as well as regular updates. But what about a layman's summary? How do most people get a grasp on what is happening, why, and what the consequences will be? Below I reproduce a summary on the situation prepared by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston. He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany's nuclear industry. This was first posted by Jason Morgan earlier this evening, and he has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here. I think it is very important that this information be widely understood. Please also take the time to read this: An informed public is key to acceptance of nuclear energy -- it was never more relevant than now.
福島原発事故-簡潔で正確な 5299;説:(東京大学エンジニアリン 2464;在学生の翻訳) (thanks to Shota Yamanaka for translation)
Twitter updates: @BraveNewClimate
New 14 March: Updates and additional Q&A information here and Technical details here
-------------
Along with reliable sources such as the IAEA and WNN updates, there is an incredible amount of misinformation and hyperbole flying around the internet and media right now about the Fukushima nuclear reactor situation. In the BNC post Discussion Thread - Japanese nuclear reactors and the 11 March 2011 earthquake (and in the many comments that attend the top post), a lot of technical detail is provided, as well as regular updates. But what about a layman's summary? How do most people get a grasp on what is happening, why, and what the consequences will be?
Below I reproduce a summary on the situation prepared by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston. He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany's nuclear industry. This was first posted by Jason Morgan earlier this evening, and he has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here. I think it is very important that this information be widely understood.
Please also take the time to read this: An informed public is key to acceptance of nuclear energy -- it was never more relevant than now.
There are two diagrams of a BWR reactor:
This one we've seen already
But this one is new to me:
So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by DoDo - May 23 41 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2341 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments