Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
If you are having trouble writing it up, here is a great example of how not to do it: "Wireless and Empire" by Aitor Anduaga. The words look like English, the sentences and paragraphs have the required structure, but when you have finished reading a paragraph, you sit there and think "what the heck was that all about???" The author is Spanish, I think, but that's not the issue. The writing could be entered into that contest for bad writing.

If it makes you feel any better to know that someone who apparently is completely incapable of communicating in English has a bunch of awards and published books--in Enlgish. Frankly, I don't get it...

by asdf on Wed Mar 9th, 2011 at 10:09:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]
WTF?

Oxford University Press: Wireless and Empire: Aitor Anduaga

Although the product of a self-proclaimed consensus politics, the British Empire was always based on communications supremacy and the knowledge of the atmosphere. Using the metaphor of a thread of five pieces representing the categories science, industry, government, the military, and the education, this is the first book to study the relations between wireless and Empire throughout the interwar period. It is also the first to make full use of the abundant archive material and rich sources existing in Britain and the Dominions. The book examines the evolving connection between the development of imperial radio communications and atmospheric physics; the expansion and strength of the British radio industry and its relationship with the elucidation of the ionosphere; and the different extent to which Australia, Canada and New Zealand managed toemulate the British model of radio R&D in the interwar years. The book ends with a highly original and provocative epilogue: 'The realist interpretation of the atmosphere'.


So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Thu Mar 10th, 2011 at 04:05:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Badly written, but it isn't nonsensical - of course it helps to know that "wireless" is an archaic (British Empire days...) term for radio..
by Metatone (metatone [a|t] gmail (dot) com) on Thu Mar 10th, 2011 at 01:00:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Ask Unka Sven "What's on the wireless?"
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Mar 10th, 2011 at 01:20:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually it probably is nonsensical. The suggestion seems to be that there are profound political and philosophical insights to be gained from looking at how radio was developed and used.

There's likely some interesting history there, but Britain's empire was already crumbling during the interwar years, it had been sustained just fine with telegraphic technology in Victorian times - so the takeaway is "the realist interpretation of the atmosphere?"

Is there some other interpretation engineers use?

What makes this interesting is that it's an example of someone writing in the language of the humanities - metaphors, frames, relationships and implications - about a technical subject.

If you understand the technology and have some insight into the politics you're left with something that looks like a dead fish halfway up a mountain - it's worth looking at out of curiosity, but you're not quite sure how it got there, and you have even less of a clue whether it's significant or just plain random.

by ThatBritGuy (thatbritguy (at) googlemail.com) on Thu Mar 10th, 2011 at 01:33:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]
ThatBritGuy:
There's likely some interesting history there, but Britain's empire was already crumbling during the interwar years, it had been sustained just fine with telegraphic technology in Victorian times

It did not just sustain fine, it used its dominance in telegraphic matters in order to help its empire, both in competition with other empires and to dominate the subjects. An example of the first: France was not allowed to use British wires to communicate with its expedition at the Fashoda crises, meaning only the British Empire had accurate information about respective strenghts at Fashoda.

In light of that radio was probably a (smallish) threath to the Empire.

A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!

by A swedish kind of death on Fri Mar 11th, 2011 at 02:27:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It IS an interesting subject. My complaint about the book is not the title (normal English usage) or even the thing about the realist model of the ionosphere (WTF?), but that when you try to read the damn thing, it is incomprehensible because the writing is so bad...
by asdf on Sat Mar 12th, 2011 at 09:56:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That's what book reviews are for. This review summarizes the contents in English, before adding
Although the topic addressed is extremely important, the source material rich and the argument full of potential, Wireless and Empire is, it must be said, often a frustrating read. A curiously stilted prose style and occasionally baroque phraseology make the narrative rather difficult to follow at times. Referencing is inconsistent and not always reliable. In these respects neither the author nor the reader has been well served by the publisher, who should surely have subedited the work before seeing it through to print.
I think the author is Basque, so that his first language might be as far from English as possible.
by gk (g k quattro due due sette "at" gmail.com) on Thu Mar 10th, 2011 at 04:18:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series