The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
[proof needed] - and in Europe.
There is nothing sufficiently unique about Europe to exempts us from simple accounting relations. Cycle-averaged balanced budgets in a nominally growing economy impose an upwards unemployment bias by withdrawing fiat-money purchasing power from the economy, relative to the demand for fiat-money purchasing power.
Was French unemployment worse in 93-08 than it was in 78-93? Growth? General state of the economy?
Both of those periods are dominated by intra-European fixed-rate ForEx regimes (the ERM between '79 and '93, the EMU between '98 and '08), so you can hardly use a comparison between the two to test a hypothesis on the influence of floating versus fixed exchange rates.
I am not contesting that repeated devaluations in a fixed exchange rate system is a poor policy. This is, I believe, a theoretically well founded and clearly empirically validated conclusion. My contentions are that
Simple inspection suggests that the 1993 devaluation was much less painful than the 2008 austerity, but in order to make a compelling case one would have to compare the magnitude of the required exchange rate adjustments to achieve real exchange rate parity with the one's choice of indicators of economic performance. I don't have 1993 price level, unemployment and exchange rate data on hand for these countries, but if you're really interested I can probably get them and run the numbers.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by gmoke - Oct 28 7 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 61 comments
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by gmoke - Oct 287 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2061 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments