The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But they have taken plenty of political decisions.
It is a political decision to create the EFSF. The size of its capital is also a political decision. The fact that tapping the EFSF is subject to "strict conditionalities" imposed by fellow EU finance ministers on the offending country is a political decision. The fact that these "strict conditionalities" amount to IMF'ing a fellow member state is a political decision. Crying bloody murder over ECB secondary market bond purchases is a political decision. So is the decision to bar the ESM (which will replace the EFSF after 2013) from buying sovereign debt in the secondary market (to complement the ECB's prohibition to buy it in the primary market). So is the decision to have "no bondholder bail-in before 2013". So is the ECB's threat to withhold liquidity from Irish banks. So is the lengthy negotiation of the parameters and timetable of banking stress tests (the very decision to do another round of banking stress tests is political).
Refer to my signature.
There is absolutely no indication that the current EU leadership has it in them to "do the right thing". In fact, in their public pronouncements on Portugal they're positively drooling over the prospect of imposing harsher austerity than rejected by the Portuguese parliament last month.
Economics is politics by other means
The issue here is that the politics has become invisible and pretends to be inevitable.
The standard narratives are now built into the frame of the debate. No serious person can ever question them, and even unserious people can have difficulty seeing through them.
Economics is politics by other means
Or in more detail, economics has become a very literal form of Newspeak.
Instead of being simple, it pretends to be complicated. But it has the same deadening effect; dissenting concepts become unthinkable, challenging questions become unaskable, and humane values become morally hazardous.
A pessimist will note that nobody in a position of power to help implement sound policy gives any indication of being able to even think in terms that makes it possible to talk about what a sound policy is.
I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
The elites, collectively, cannot bring themselves to moderate their greed even in the interests of prolonging their highly successful game, and all others have not been able to bring themselves to stop the elites or even to significantly oppose them. So we roll onward towards the cliff that lies ahead. The question that remains is the extent to which those elites and those who serve them understand this and are just caught up "riding the tiger", are complete, unquestioning believers in the propaganda that has been promulgated on their behalf or simply don't care about the consequences and are convinced that the consequences will be for others.
"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
But this means Spain will have to do whatever Germany decides it has to do. Otherwise Spain will follow Portugal fate and the ECB will stop buying bonds.
And here you have a poker game if Germany and Spain knew what they are doing.. the problem is that the crazy economic sect of uber-austerity is in the middle of the game. They may want Spain to receive a lesson, and more pain for the South and all that stuff. They could destroy the euro in theprocess.
So, the austeristas and gold-stadnard lovers will have to break one of their dremas. A pure gold-standard, since the ECB has to buy spanish debt... or just the end of the euro-gold because noone will pay the spanish bail-out.
Two years on, the only last hope of Spain is still that it is too big to fail and the ECB must fix the spanish bond rate or the euro can go in flames...
The other option is that they try to do a Portugal to Spain... more pain for Spain.. and a bridge loan.. and then moves to the next country.
I therefore claim to show, not how men think in myths, but how myths operate in men's minds without their being aware of the fact.
by Bernard - Jun 26 37 comments
by Migeru - Jun 26 61 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 27 21 comments
by rifek - Jun 27 29 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 25 91 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 24 72 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 23 40 comments
by tyronen - Jun 22 38 comments
by rifek - Jun 2729 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2721 comments
by Bernard - Jun 2637 comments
by Migeru - Jun 2661 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2591 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2472 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2340 comments
by tyronen - Jun 2238 comments
by John Redmond - Jun 1726 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1734 comments
by gmoke - Jun 155 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1362 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1231 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Jun 104 comments
by generic - Jun 81 comment
by fjallstrom - Jun 81 comment
by DoDo - Jun 647 comments
by ARGeezer - Jun 617 comments
by DoDo - Jun 568 comments
by ARGeezer - Jun 270 comments