The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I agree that georgism is not without question marks. However your example is not one of those:
Person has a small plot of land (really small, maybe not even enough for subsistence) with a small home.
This person would pay zero LVT, because his plot produces only subsistence. LVT taxes only surplus, not necessary costs of capital or labour.
What would tax collector benefit by capturing worthless land?
The tax collector could be an agent, not of the people, but of the very rich people.
You mean that the tax collector would change the tax code at the moment the ownership is changed? Why otherwise would very rich people pay tax from a plot that does not produce anything? And when the land becomes more valuable, the tax increases even more. You are not talking about land tax at all. You are talking about "poll tax."
The tax collector is an agent of the very rich people now. They tax labour for the benefit of banks and property owners.
You mean that the tax collector would change the tax code at the moment the ownership is changed?
by fjallstrom - Feb 28 72 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 26 122 comments
by talos - Feb 23 170 comments
by DoDo - Feb 22 6 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21 256 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by ATinNM - Feb 20 13 comments
by Migeru - Feb 13 88 comments
by fjallstrom - Feb 2872 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 26122 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by talos - Feb 23170 comments
by DoDo - Feb 226 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21256 comments
by ATinNM - Feb 2013 comments
by Migeru - Feb 1388 comments
by DoDo - Feb 12261 comments
by Migeru - Feb 3266 comments