The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I agree that georgism is not without question marks. However your example is not one of those:
Person has a small plot of land (really small, maybe not even enough for subsistence) with a small home.
This person would pay zero LVT, because his plot produces only subsistence. LVT taxes only surplus, not necessary costs of capital or labour.
What would tax collector benefit by capturing worthless land?
The tax collector could be an agent, not of the people, but of the very rich people.
You mean that the tax collector would change the tax code at the moment the ownership is changed? Why otherwise would very rich people pay tax from a plot that does not produce anything? And when the land becomes more valuable, the tax increases even more. You are not talking about land tax at all. You are talking about "poll tax."
The tax collector is an agent of the very rich people now. They tax labour for the benefit of banks and property owners.
You mean that the tax collector would change the tax code at the moment the ownership is changed?
by gmoke - May 19
by redstar - May 12 18 comments
by redstar - May 14 14 comments
by redstar - May 6 50 comments
by Luis de Sousa - May 1 13 comments
by talos - Apr 29 49 comments
by gmoke - Apr 29 2 comments
by In Wales - May 3 1 comment
by gmoke - May 19
by redstar - May 1414 comments
by redstar - May 1218 comments
by redstar - May 650 comments
by In Wales - May 31 comment
by Luis de Sousa - May 113 comments
by gmoke - Apr 292 comments
by talos - Apr 2949 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Apr 245 comments
by afew - Apr 2056 comments