The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So, the question would be, how many would die over a few decades of poverty, versus how many died when Argentina's economy collapsed.
At the end of last year the Spanish government announced their intention to partially privatize the national lotteries. The suggested price was ridiculously low. Basically, the government was reacting to "the markets" demanding 5%-7% for long-term lending by selling the lotteries at a 15%+ implied yield. A lot of people made the same back-of-the-envelope yield calculation and were wondering how one would go about buying some stock when this is privatised...
DiagonalPeriodico.net: El coste de la privatización de la lotería
En diciembre, el Gobierno anunció la privatización del 30% de Loterías y Apuestas del Estado. El motivo, según confesó la ministra de Economía, Elena Salgado, a un medio extranjero, era "hacer caja". Sin embargo, los números no cuadran: el Ejecutivo anunció que con ese 30% preveía ingresar unos 5.000 millones de euros, cuando la entidad permite ingresar a las arcas públicas casi 3.000 millones de euros al año. El PP, que se opone a esta venta "de saldo", cifra en 20.000 millones la operación para que esta sea rentable.
In December, the Government announced the privatisation of 30% of the State Lotteries and Bets. The motive the economy minister Elena Salgado's confessed to a foreign media outlet was "to cash in". However, the numbers don't add up. The government announced that with this 30% they intended to raise 5bn, when the public entity produces an income of 3bn a year for the public treasury. The PP, opposing this "firesale", values the operation at 20bn for it to be profitable
Short term tax cuts which screw the country in the long term. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
If you think universities are real messed up right now, check this out.
I've recently had the idea that sit-ins wouldn't work at the university. So I thought to myself why not shit-ins. They piss you off, you all go in, pop a squat in their office, and then leave.
Seriously though, asset stripping is a huge problem, and we should start to refer to "privatization" schemes that have this effect as such. And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
He: We sold it--- last year.
She: Oh, yes. "In such an environment it is not surprising that the ills of technology should seem curable only through the application of more technology..." John W Aldridge
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments