The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If the EU were a sensible body interested in creating convergence towards a higher standard of living, the concern would be about how to increase productivity.
it's difficult I note to be productive when there are no jobs out there
But every time you lay off a worker or cut his wages you increase "productivity". Could part of the problem be the way in which we understand, conceptualize and use the term "productivity".?
For example, labor productivity is typically measured as a ratio of output per labor-hour, an input.
So, according to this definition, widely used by "mainstream economics" by saving GM and Chrysler a large increase in productivity was foregone. This is a fallacy of composition error. It fails to take into account the knock on effects of losing the US parts manufactures, which could have seriously damaged Ford, the one auto manufacturer that did not require a bail out. Optimize productivity and you end up with no industry in high wage countries.
The Sacred Chalice of Productivity needs to be prominently labeled as "POISON, USE WITH CAUTION!".
As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by DoDo - Apr 21 3 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 18 21 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 20
by ARGeezer - Apr 18 7 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 12 30 comments
by DoDo - Apr 6 39 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 8 6 comments
by Oui - Apr 16 3 comments
by DoDo - Apr 213 comments
by gmoke - Apr 20
by Cyrille - Apr 20
by ARGeezer - Apr 187 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 1821 comments
by Oui - Apr 163 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 1230 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 86 comments
by DoDo - Apr 639 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3158 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 3110 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 2910 comments
by DoDo - Mar 279 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 275 comments