The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If the EU were a sensible body interested in creating convergence towards a higher standard of living, the concern would be about how to increase productivity.
it's difficult I note to be productive when there are no jobs out there
But every time you lay off a worker or cut his wages you increase "productivity". Could part of the problem be the way in which we understand, conceptualize and use the term "productivity".?
For example, labor productivity is typically measured as a ratio of output per labor-hour, an input.
So, according to this definition, widely used by "mainstream economics" by saving GM and Chrysler a large increase in productivity was foregone. This is a fallacy of composition error. It fails to take into account the knock on effects of losing the US parts manufactures, which could have seriously damaged Ford, the one auto manufacturer that did not require a bail out. Optimize productivity and you end up with no industry in high wage countries.
The Sacred Chalice of Productivity needs to be prominently labeled as "POISON, USE WITH CAUTION!".
As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by melo - Jan 23 4 comments
by afew - Jan 25 2 comments
by gmoke - Jan 15 5 comments
by DoDo - Jan 20 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16 104 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 1 65 comments
by afew - Jan 5 44 comments
by rifek - Jan 5 9 comments
by afew - Jan 252 comments
by melo - Jan 234 comments
by DoDo - Jan 204 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16104 comments
by gmoke - Jan 155 comments
by afew - Jan 544 comments
by rifek - Jan 59 comments
by DoDo - Jan 25 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 165 comments
by melo - Dec 316 comments
by Metatone - Dec 3129 comments
by rz - Dec 2956 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 2755 comments
by das monde - Dec 2726 comments