The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If the EU were a sensible body interested in creating convergence towards a higher standard of living, the concern would be about how to increase productivity.
it's difficult I note to be productive when there are no jobs out there
But every time you lay off a worker or cut his wages you increase "productivity". Could part of the problem be the way in which we understand, conceptualize and use the term "productivity".?
For example, labor productivity is typically measured as a ratio of output per labor-hour, an input.
So, according to this definition, widely used by "mainstream economics" by saving GM and Chrysler a large increase in productivity was foregone. This is a fallacy of composition error. It fails to take into account the knock on effects of losing the US parts manufactures, which could have seriously damaged Ford, the one auto manufacturer that did not require a bail out. Optimize productivity and you end up with no industry in high wage countries.
The Sacred Chalice of Productivity needs to be prominently labeled as "POISON, USE WITH CAUTION!".
As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by DoDo - Sep 1 22 comments
by marco - Aug 24 20 comments
by car05 - Aug 27 10 comments
by gmoke - Aug 17
by john_evans - Aug 18 26 comments
by Metatone - Aug 14 24 comments
by DoDo - Aug 11 91 comments
by Helen - Aug 3 38 comments
by DoDo - Sep 122 comments
by car05 - Aug 2710 comments
by marco - Aug 2420 comments
by john_evans - Aug 1826 comments
by gmoke - Aug 17
by Metatone - Aug 1424 comments
by DoDo - Aug 1191 comments
by Helen - Aug 338 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2246 comments