The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If the EU were a sensible body interested in creating convergence towards a higher standard of living, the concern would be about how to increase productivity.
it's difficult I note to be productive when there are no jobs out there
But every time you lay off a worker or cut his wages you increase "productivity". Could part of the problem be the way in which we understand, conceptualize and use the term "productivity".?
For example, labor productivity is typically measured as a ratio of output per labor-hour, an input.
So, according to this definition, widely used by "mainstream economics" by saving GM and Chrysler a large increase in productivity was foregone. This is a fallacy of composition error. It fails to take into account the knock on effects of losing the US parts manufactures, which could have seriously damaged Ford, the one auto manufacturer that did not require a bail out. Optimize productivity and you end up with no industry in high wage countries.
The Sacred Chalice of Productivity needs to be prominently labeled as "POISON, USE WITH CAUTION!".
As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 44 comments
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 25 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2044 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments
by afew - Sep 2240 comments