The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He will also have greater expenses as he ALSO needs to pay for his place to live.
He has no greater expenses, because the tenant pays all his "investment" costs. The BTL makes his profit from capital gains.
Which needs not be a bad thing where there are too many owner-occupied houses...
Then address the bubble, but not the idea of buying to let. Banning buy-to-let, in the long run, means that there will be no rental market at all.
Who needs rental market? Some CEO's in business trips? Labour families don't need them.
But in general, I don't see how having lots of owner-occupied houses is a nice goal per se.
by Bernard - Apr 24 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 5 comments
by Bernard - Apr 6 5 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 2 57 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 275 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2422 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments
by marco - Apr 430 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 257 comments