The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He will also have greater expenses as he ALSO needs to pay for his place to live.
He has no greater expenses, because the tenant pays all his "investment" costs. The BTL makes his profit from capital gains.
Which needs not be a bad thing where there are too many owner-occupied houses...
Then address the bubble, but not the idea of buying to let. Banning buy-to-let, in the long run, means that there will be no rental market at all.
Who needs rental market? Some CEO's in business trips? Labour families don't need them.
But in general, I don't see how having lots of owner-occupied houses is a nice goal per se.
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 44 comments
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 25 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2044 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments
by afew - Sep 2240 comments