The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
He will also have greater expenses as he ALSO needs to pay for his place to live.
He has no greater expenses, because the tenant pays all his "investment" costs. The BTL makes his profit from capital gains.
Which needs not be a bad thing where there are too many owner-occupied houses...
Then address the bubble, but not the idea of buying to let. Banning buy-to-let, in the long run, means that there will be no rental market at all.
Who needs rental market? Some CEO's in business trips? Labour families don't need them.
But in general, I don't see how having lots of owner-occupied houses is a nice goal per se.
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 29 comments
by gmoke - May 19 5 comments
by redstar - May 12 18 comments
by redstar - May 14 16 comments
by redstar - May 6 50 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 2329 comments
by gmoke - May 195 comments
by redstar - May 1416 comments
by redstar - May 1218 comments
by redstar - May 650 comments
by In Wales - May 31 comment
by Luis de Sousa - May 113 comments
by gmoke - Apr 292 comments
by talos - Apr 2949 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Apr 245 comments