The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Think about a negative-amortisation loan as an interest-only loan plus some fictional interest. This extra interest increases the bank's assets but not its liabilities, compared to an interest-only loan at a correspondingly lower interest. It's free funny-money for the bank, in that it comes with no funding cost - no extra liabilities means no need to borrow more from the CB.
Taxes don't work like that, because they have to be paid in real money, not Monopoly money. So a consumer loan to pay taxes actually increases the bank's liabilities, making it less attractive on paper.
(That, and mortgages typically come with stickier strings attached than consumer loans.)
Of course there are no regulations that a sufficiently incompetent or corrupt regulator cannot fuck up. Foolproof systems do not exist in economics, and even if they did nature is ever at work improving the stock of fools. But as a first line of defence, property taxes are not bad.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by Metatone - Aug 22 7 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 21 31 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 15 28 comments
by afew - Aug 19 65 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 7 78 comments
by Oui - Aug 6 65 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 30 43 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6 188 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by Metatone - Aug 227 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 2131 comments
by afew - Aug 1965 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 1528 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 778 comments
by Oui - Aug 665 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6188 comments
by Oui - Aug 53 comments
by Oui - Aug 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 3043 comments
by Oui - Jul 284 comments
by gmoke - Jul 271 comment