The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Think about a negative-amortisation loan as an interest-only loan plus some fictional interest. This extra interest increases the bank's assets but not its liabilities, compared to an interest-only loan at a correspondingly lower interest. It's free funny-money for the bank, in that it comes with no funding cost - no extra liabilities means no need to borrow more from the CB.
Taxes don't work like that, because they have to be paid in real money, not Monopoly money. So a consumer loan to pay taxes actually increases the bank's liabilities, making it less attractive on paper.
(That, and mortgages typically come with stickier strings attached than consumer loans.)
Of course there are no regulations that a sufficiently incompetent or corrupt regulator cannot fuck up. Foolproof systems do not exist in economics, and even if they did nature is ever at work improving the stock of fools. But as a first line of defence, property taxes are not bad.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 19 32 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 7 87 comments
by Oui - Nov 20 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 25 20 comments
by Cat - Nov 3 20 comments
by gmoke - Oct 31 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 28 17 comments
by Oui - Nov 203 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1932 comments
by Oui - Nov 161 comment
by Oui - Nov 162 comments
by Oui - Nov 89 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 787 comments
by gmoke - Nov 6
by Cat - Nov 320 comments
by gmoke - Oct 315 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2817 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2520 comments
by Cat - Oct 2127 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1779 comments