The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If you make a revenue-neutral shift in the tax share from income to real estate, real estate prices are going to drop.
Not so fast.
First, of course tax increase is a market value depreciation. But only half of the housing is apartments, another half is commercial real estate. And from both these big portion are not owner-occupied. And add there natural monopolies.
But second, real estate tax transfers money from economic rent payments to the demand of goods and services. This means higher employment, higher wages (=less labour supply) and higher wealth for wealth creators. This would change income distribution for the benefit of labour and landless. That means higher demand for housing market.
And second, even if it did work, it would build a general tax-cut bias into your political economy, because every time a wingnut government lowered taxes on real estate, the next responsible government would have to limit itself to revenue-neutral tax reforms in order to prevent a housing panic.
Why would "revenue-neutral" become such a keyword? And land tax is not a "tax" really. It is a return of public wealth to the public.
But of course we have seen this in the USA. They have made there for 100 years politics with "property tax relief" agenda. And property tax is the most hated tax everywhere.
by talos - Feb 23 170 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 26 93 comments
by DoDo - Feb 22 6 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21 256 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by ATinNM - Feb 20 13 comments
by Migeru - Feb 13 88 comments
by DoDo - Feb 12 261 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 2693 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by talos - Feb 23170 comments
by DoDo - Feb 226 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21256 comments
by ATinNM - Feb 2013 comments
by Migeru - Feb 1388 comments
by DoDo - Feb 12261 comments
by Migeru - Feb 3266 comments
by afew - Jan 2831 comments