The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The problem is that if you raise real estate taxes on your residential owner-occupiers, a number of them becomes insolvent (because this tax is discounted in the market value).
If their mortgage goes underwater, it does not mean they are insolvent, if their other wealth increases. You cannot decide a household wealth only from the balance sheet of their mortgage.
And anyway, this is an issue of politics. That is a very poor starting point for seeking remedies. Politics must follow policy, not the other way around.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out amortisations, they don't matter to demand. Taxes destroy money, amortisation destroys money - either way, the money is destroyed.
No. This is the central point. Property tax destroys economic rent. Labour tax destroys wealth. A whole different thing.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out interest payments, you reduce banker income, which ceteris paribus reduces demand.
It is not ceteris paribus at all. When banker incomes are economic rent (created interest charges over existing wealth, like land, real estate, shares etc.) these "incomes" are the actual "the beef" that destroy demand. This is exactly what property tax helps to get rid of.
by gmoke - Sep 27 6 comments
by gmoke - Sep 11 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17 116 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 4 8 comments
by Helen - Sep 6 66 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Sep 276 comments
by gmoke - Sep 25
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17116 comments
by gmoke - Sep 112 comments
by Helen - Sep 666 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 48 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 219 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3050 comments