The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The problem is that if you raise real estate taxes on your residential owner-occupiers, a number of them becomes insolvent (because this tax is discounted in the market value).
If their mortgage goes underwater, it does not mean they are insolvent, if their other wealth increases. You cannot decide a household wealth only from the balance sheet of their mortgage.
And anyway, this is an issue of politics. That is a very poor starting point for seeking remedies. Politics must follow policy, not the other way around.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out amortisations, they don't matter to demand. Taxes destroy money, amortisation destroys money - either way, the money is destroyed.
No. This is the central point. Property tax destroys economic rent. Labour tax destroys wealth. A whole different thing.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out interest payments, you reduce banker income, which ceteris paribus reduces demand.
It is not ceteris paribus at all. When banker incomes are economic rent (created interest charges over existing wealth, like land, real estate, shares etc.) these "incomes" are the actual "the beef" that destroy demand. This is exactly what property tax helps to get rid of.
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 27 4 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments
by afew - Sep 2240 comments
by Migeru - Sep 2133 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1927 comments