The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The problem is that if you raise real estate taxes on your residential owner-occupiers, a number of them becomes insolvent (because this tax is discounted in the market value).
If their mortgage goes underwater, it does not mean they are insolvent, if their other wealth increases. You cannot decide a household wealth only from the balance sheet of their mortgage.
And anyway, this is an issue of politics. That is a very poor starting point for seeking remedies. Politics must follow policy, not the other way around.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out amortisations, they don't matter to demand. Taxes destroy money, amortisation destroys money - either way, the money is destroyed.
No. This is the central point. Property tax destroys economic rent. Labour tax destroys wealth. A whole different thing.
Inasmuch as taxes crowd out interest payments, you reduce banker income, which ceteris paribus reduces demand.
It is not ceteris paribus at all. When banker incomes are economic rent (created interest charges over existing wealth, like land, real estate, shares etc.) these "incomes" are the actual "the beef" that destroy demand. This is exactly what property tax helps to get rid of.
by Migeru - Aug 24 12 comments
by Melanchthon - Aug 23 18 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 18 62 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6 117 comments
by gmoke - Jul 29 8 comments
by ARGeezer - Aug 5 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 3 19 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 29 17 comments
by Migeru - Aug 2412 comments
by Melanchthon - Aug 2318 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1862 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 6117 comments
by gmoke - Aug 5
by ARGeezer - Aug 54 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 319 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Jul 303 comments
by gmoke - Jul 298 comments
by ARGeezer - Jul 2917 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2869 comments
by gmoke - Jul 282 comments