Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
No. Taxes do not fund spending.

That's semantics. In that model, you need to destroy money to avoid it becoming worthless.

Unless the rentier was planning to spend the money on real goods and services, taxing it away does nothing to create spending room for the sovereign.

If you tax rentier, you destroy costs. If you tax labour you destroy wealth.
If money creation creates just rents/interest, it destroys wealth. And to avoid destruction, you must stop printing money, right? Like Michael Hudson says, interest grows exponentially, productivity linearly.
Keynesians seem to think that more money = more wealth. That's not the case. The issue is income distribution, not money creation.

by kjr63 on Sun Jun 12th, 2011 at 05:56:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

Deflationary QE

by afew - Jan 25
2 comments

Another modest proposal. LQD.

by melo - Jan 23
4 comments

On the RhB 2: along the Inn river

by DoDo - Jan 20
4 comments

Piketty: Amnesia, Selfishness

by afew - Jan 5
44 comments

Reality According to the OBR

by rifek - Jan 5
9 comments

Occasional Series