The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That's semantics. In that model, you need to destroy money to avoid it becoming worthless.
Only if the rentier was planning to spend it.
Money that just sits in your bank account does not cause inflation.
If you tax rentier, you destroy costs.
You keep saying that, but it's just not so.
If you tax the rentier, you make sure that the rent is paid to the tax man rather than the private rentier. But that does not make the rent go away - the user still has to pay it.
What it does do is alter the term structure of the rent - from being paid up front in the asset price to being paid over time in taxes. Which is helpful in preventing bubbles, but not make the rent any lower in and of itself.
Like Michael Hudson says, interest grows exponentially,
But it does not, unless you allow scammy stuff like negative amortisation loans.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by afew - Jan 28 29 comments
by melo - Jan 23 4 comments
by gmoke - Jan 15 5 comments
by DoDo - Jan 20 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16 111 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 1 66 comments
by afew - Jan 5 48 comments
by afew - Jan 2829 comments
by melo - Jan 234 comments
by DoDo - Jan 204 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 16111 comments
by gmoke - Jan 155 comments
by afew - Jan 548 comments
by rifek - Jan 59 comments
by DoDo - Jan 25 comments
by ChrisCook - Jan 166 comments
by melo - Dec 316 comments
by Metatone - Dec 3129 comments