The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
That's semantics. In that model, you need to destroy money to avoid it becoming worthless.
Only if the rentier was planning to spend it.
Money that just sits in your bank account does not cause inflation.
If you tax rentier, you destroy costs.
You keep saying that, but it's just not so.
If you tax the rentier, you make sure that the rent is paid to the tax man rather than the private rentier. But that does not make the rent go away - the user still has to pay it.
What it does do is alter the term structure of the rent - from being paid up front in the asset price to being paid over time in taxes. Which is helpful in preventing bubbles, but not make the rent any lower in and of itself.
Like Michael Hudson says, interest grows exponentially,
But it does not, unless you allow scammy stuff like negative amortisation loans.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 23 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 6 68 comments
by THE Twank - Feb 13 15 comments
by generic - Jan 30 7 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3 100 comments
by THE Twank - Feb 27
by ATinNM - Feb 261 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 239 comments
by THE Twank - Feb 20
by THE Twank - Feb 1315 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 668 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Feb 3100 comments
by Zwackus - Feb 258 comments
by Drew J Jones - Feb 123 comments
by generic - Jan 307 comments
by Drew J Jones - Jan 3085 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 2813 comments