The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Looks like the bubble did deflate, got stabilised and is deflating again. Economics is politics by other means
Express.co.uk - Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: 2015 housing recovery predicted
Improvements to the major banks' balance sheets should lead to them loosening their strict lending criteria, enabling more people to buy a home.The previous upturn in the housing market was caused by a mismatch between supply and demand, but the recovery petered out as economic uncertainty caused potential buyers to sit on their hands, while those who wanted to press ahead with a purchase continued to face problems raising the mortgage finance they needed.But CEBR said with just 130,000 new homes built in 2010, around half the level needed to keep pace with the growing number of households, prices should increase by 16% between 2011 and 2015, the equivalent of a gain of around 4% a year.The recovery will be more marked in London, with demand from international buyers, as the pound remains weak, set to push up the cost of housing in the capital by around 2% a year more than across the UK as a whole.
The rent for that area today is still around £1000-1200 for a 3br.
If Helen is complaining that prices out in suburbia are outrageous, well, colour me unimpressed. Economics is politics by other means
I think I may have mentioned the local manor house - not a huge country house, but more than 4 beds - is being rented for £2k pcm.
At the other extreme the top line London properties go for around £1-3m for a penthouse flat in a des area, to £3-5m for a family house somewhere on the outskirts, two or three times that closer in, and £20-40m for a premium property near the centre.
There are rumours the flats in Hyde Park One - supposedly the most expensive tower block in London - sold for around £70m.
An estate near me with four substantial houses and a fair amount of land sold for around £6m recently.
Typical "successful middle class" homes - lawyers, business owners, small-scale entrepreneurs, minion-class board members, thieves and gangsters - are consistently between £1-2m in most of the UK, and maybe double that around the London green belts.
I have no idea how these prices compare to the rest of the EU.
As for Leyton being "cheap", it has always been true that you can always tell Londoners as they (mostly) live outside the M25. London is full of people who weren't born there and are on their way somewhere else (better probably).
Anybody who wants to won a house with garden cannot possibly afford london anymore, so they leave.
As this letter in the Independent explained today (I didn't write it);-
Once upon a time, not too long ago, a single bread-winner could go out and earn sufficient money to both feed a typical family and pay a reasonable mortgage. Nowadays two bread-winners are struggling to earn sufficient to be able to save for a deposit ("Britain to become a nation of renters", 31 May). Obviously something has gone badly wrong; either rates of pay are far too low or house prices are far too high. The only two solutions seem to be to raise wages or to build a lot more council houses to reduce house prices. Incidentally, if the principle of "right to buy" is such a good principle, why isn't it extended to the private rented sector?
Obviously something has gone badly wrong; either rates of pay are far too low or house prices are far too high. The only two solutions seem to be to raise wages or to build a lot more council houses to reduce house prices.
Incidentally, if the principle of "right to buy" is such a good principle, why isn't it extended to the private rented sector?
Anybody who wants to own a house with garden
where people will mortgage themselves to the hilt to own a huge house out in the desert and commute 2h each way in traffic jams.
Dude, we don't all live in Southern California. ;) Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
Once upon a time, not too long ago, a single bread-winner could go out and earn sufficient money to both feed a typical family and pay a reasonable mortgage. Nowadays two bread-winners are struggling to earn sufficient to be able to save for a deposit ("Britain to become a nation of renters", 31 May). Obviously something has gone badly wrong; either rates of pay are far too low or house prices are far too high. The only two solutions seem to be to raise wages or to build a lot more council houses to reduce house prices.
Out at this distance, being London comuterland, just over an hour by train from St Pancras station, it's £800 to rent a 2 bed house/flat, with an extra £600 to spend on monthly train tickets to get to work if you work in the London.
That's insane.
An hour by ordinary commuter rail... that's what, 100 km? And you're not crossing any expensive bridges or tunnels.
Two adults, monthly rail cards, 100 km, no choke points, that shouldn't work out to more than £100-200. Tops.
What has the UK been doing to its rail net?
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
It's all about choices.
But, yes, I was just checking that a 1-way ticket from Luton to St. Pancras (30 minute train ride) costs 13 pounds off-peak. So spending 30 pounds a day commuting into London (plus some London public transport) does not seem impossible. Economics is politics by other means
But, yes, I was just checking that a 1-way ticket from Luton to St. Pancras (30 minute train ride) costs 13 pounds off-peak.
But any properly run rail net has a tiered price scheme, where greater commitment on volume nets you lower price. That separates chumps and tourists from their money more efficiently, while still allowing commuters to pay only the (lower) true economic cost.
If you buy a monthly card and you're not getting at least 50 % off the one-way price, you should feel like someone's cheating you. Coz they would be. Hell, in Copenhagen, a ten-trip card gives you 30-40 % off the one-way price, and the monthly card breaks even with the ten-ticket packs at around 40 trips per month.
Advance - Buy in advance, sold in limited numbers and subject to availability. These tickets are only valid on the date/train specified. Off-Peak - Buy any time, travel off-peak Anytime - Buy any time, travel any time Season - Unlimited travel between two stations for a specified period Rovers and Rangers - Unlimited travel within a specified area. There may be a few time restrictions on when you can travel.
Railcards offer value for money if you travel by train, saving you at least 1/3 on rail fares. They cost from £18 to £26 each and are valid for 12 months. Our Railcards page shows more details. Take a look at our discounts page to see what other discounts are available.
There are people out here who commute to London regularly - about 3-4 hours by car and 2 hours by train.
But if the mortgage doesn't get you the train fares will.
An hour into London isn't much worse than getting in from (say) the outer limits of Zone 6.
Brighton to Bank is an hour and nineteen. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by DoDo - May 20 35 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2035 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments