Display:
Climate change is beginning to acerbate over-population.  

What needs to be understood is "over-population" is a conclusion reached through analysis of the number of predators to the number of prey.  (Using "predators" and "prey" in an abstract sense.)  Climate change is a systematic variant (changeable) first directly lowering prey, e.g., global wheat production, which follows through to stressing and then lowering predator population.  Typically in these scenarios the predator population crashes below objective conditions for the predator population.  The typical run of events:

  1.  Prey population increases
  2.  Predator population increases
  3.  The system become unbalanced
  4.  Prey population crashes
  5.  Predator population crashes
  6.  Prey population stabilizes at a lower rate and begins to climb
  7.  Predator population stabilizes at a lower rate and begins to climb

As the canonical Canadian hare/lynx relationship illustrates:

 

Unfortunately, there is another canonical scenario where the rate of predation is above the rate of prey population renewal and the prey goes extinct.  This seems to have happened with the mastodon; humans over-predated the species to extinction; I note Climate Change was also affective in this scenario.  Something similar is happening with oil/human "predation."  

If you will.

by ATinNM on Tue May 10th, 2011 at 02:17:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Adding to the sequence (and this is especially typical of us large predators):

  • go after the easy food first (big, meaty, slow moving critters) and then work your way down the food web
  • eliminate rival predators (either directly or indirectly by taking their food and/or space)

With these two additions you can see why the Mastadon, the Dodo, the Great Auk, and many, many other large animals were hunted to extinction and also why predators like the European Brown Bear are either locally extinct or barely holding on climate change or not.

But you also have to note that we as a predator have already exhausted pretty much all of the available prey (the Grand Banks fishery was problably the last truly abundant source) and are thus no longer following that progression. We've learned that once we clean out an existing ecosystem, we then have to create our own dedicated (and grossly over-simplified) ecosystem as a replacement. We're still working the bugs out of this one.

by Jace (jace6315 at yahoo etc.) on Tue May 10th, 2011 at 04:00:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]
"Prey" can also be physical natural resources such as oil.  
by ATinNM on Wed May 11th, 2011 at 01:44:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Except that oil has virtually no capability to recover stocks

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu May 12th, 2011 at 06:34:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Of course it does. God wouldn't let us run out of oil.
by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Thu May 12th, 2011 at 07:09:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Over a 1000 Million year timeframe, no problem.

Index of Frank's Diaries
by Frank Schnittger (mail Frankschnittger at hot dotty communists) on Thu May 12th, 2011 at 10:49:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Exactly.

I find it illuminating to use, e.g., "we are predating oil to scarcity along an exponential growth curve," as an analytical heuristic.  Thinking along these lines it becomes immediately apparent if the replacement rate of the prey (oil) is below predation (extraction) rate systematic use of the prey (oil) MUST, at some point, change the "ecology," or Fitness Landscape, necessarily leading to a change in consumption patterns of the predators (Actors) to accommodate lowering availability of the prey.  This change in consumption patterns changes the predation rate, which changes the Fitness Landscape, changing the predation rate, & round and round we go.

There is more that fall out of the heuristic, I'll only mention one: emergent behaviors, and everything that EB drags along, are inherent.  This is in sharp contrast to NCE where EB, e.g., "Black Swans," are always a surprise.

by ATinNM on Thu May 12th, 2011 at 01:27:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Only renewables. Nonrenewables follow a different model.

Economics is politics by other means
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 16th, 2011 at 04:19:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]
See this thread for a discussion of Lotka-Volterra as a model of consumption of renewable resources. Also this thread
imagine that the red line in the chart is humanity and the black line its renewable resource base.

Finally this thread on logistic consumption of nonrenewable resources.

Economics is politics by other means
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon May 16th, 2011 at 04:16:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series