The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by talos - Feb 23 167 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 26 87 comments
by DoDo - Feb 22 6 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21 249 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by ATinNM - Feb 20 13 comments
by Migeru - Feb 13 88 comments
by DoDo - Feb 12 261 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 2687 comments
by gmoke - Feb 24
by talos - Feb 23167 comments
by DoDo - Feb 226 comments
by Migeru - Feb 21249 comments
by ATinNM - Feb 2013 comments
by Migeru - Feb 1388 comments
by DoDo - Feb 12261 comments
by Migeru - Feb 3266 comments
by afew - Jan 2831 comments