The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by aquilon - Mar 10 31 comments
by epochepoque - Mar 7 11 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 8 1 comment
by afew - Mar 7 36 comments
by DoDo - Mar 10 16 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 10 6 comments
by marco - Mar 3 43 comments
by maracatu - Feb 25 13 comments
by gmoke - Mar 10
by ARGeezer - Mar 106 comments
by aquilon - Mar 1031 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1016 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 81 comment
by epochepoque - Mar 711 comments
by afew - Mar 736 comments
by Oui - Mar 560 comments
by Oui - Mar 413 comments
by marco - Mar 343 comments
by vbo - Mar 124 comments
by Oui - Mar 11 comment
by Oui - Mar 13 comments
by Metatone - Feb 287 comments
by vbo - Feb 27110 comments
by gmoke - Feb 263 comments
by vbo - Feb 25102 comments
by maracatu - Feb 2513 comments
by Oui - Feb 2432 comments
by Oui - Feb 2214 comments