The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by Cyrille - Apr 12 24 comments
by DoDo - Apr 6 39 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 8 6 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 31 10 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 29 6 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3 147 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 27 5 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Mar 20 66 comments
by Oui - Apr 16
by Cyrille - Apr 1224 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 86 comments
by DoDo - Apr 639 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3147 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 3110 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 296 comments
by DoDo - Mar 279 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 275 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Mar 2066 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1818 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 1737 comments
by marco - Mar 369 comments