The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by DoDo - May 1 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 30 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 28 7 comments
by Bernard - Apr 24 27 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 4
by DoDo - May 120 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 303 comments
by gmoke - Apr 287 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2712 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2427 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments