The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 44 comments
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 25 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2044 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments
by afew - Sep 2240 comments