The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by DoDo - Dec 18 1 comment
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 62 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 2 comments
by gmoke - Dec 2 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 17 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 26 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ARGeezer - Dec 8 16 comments
by DoDo - Dec 181 comment
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 171 comment
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 162 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 1562 comments
by das monde - Dec 1417 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 20
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments