The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
just wondering if there may be some justification in legacy carbon based generators feeling used because they are expected to be available to provide base load at any time wind etc. doesn't,
What ticks off the baseload coal burners is not that they don't get to provide baseload. Because they do. It is that other people get to provide baseload as well.
A newly built coal-burner has similar economics to a wind farm - high up-front costs, low(ish) variable costs (if you exclude the subsidy-by-dead-Chinese-coal-miner). Which means that insistence on marginal pricing locks out new coal almost as effectively as it locks out new wind.
... but fully amortised coal has an equity cushion to survive higher volatility. Which means it gets to benefit from the higher average prices (due to the lock-out of capital intensive low average cost producers). If you repair the market structure to allow wind farms in, you undercut that particular source of rent for old, fully amortised coal-burners.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by fjallstrom - Oct 12 3 comments
by DoDo - Oct 5 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 11 5 comments
by gmoke - Oct 1 4 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 28 28 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 5 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 24 19 comments
by ATinNM - Sep 24 16 comments
by fjallstrom - Oct 123 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 115 comments
by DoDo - Oct 59 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 52 comments
by gmoke - Oct 14 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 2828 comments
by ATinNM - Sep 2416 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2419 comments
by gmoke - Sep 23
by DoDo - Sep 1226 comments