The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As to the pragmatic question of what happens if if where they end up on the merit order curve leaves them unable to cover their financial capital obligations ... someone ends up taking a financial haircut, and the asset is revalued, either internally or on sale, as back-up generating capacity.
If a sound energy policy is pursued, its not necessary to expand the capacity of the coal-fired generators in particular, so the fact that their legacy capital costs might not be covered is no threat to the real system. Its a financial loss, sure, but covering for that is just corporate welfare ~ in a more capitalist version of corporatism, we'd apply the rule that you pays your money and you takes your chances.
I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by DoDo - May 1 18 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 30 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 28 7 comments
by Bernard - Apr 24 27 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 12 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 4
by DoDo - May 118 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 303 comments
by gmoke - Apr 287 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2712 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2427 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments
by marco - Apr 430 comments