The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As to the pragmatic question of what happens if if where they end up on the merit order curve leaves them unable to cover their financial capital obligations ... someone ends up taking a financial haircut, and the asset is revalued, either internally or on sale, as back-up generating capacity.
If a sound energy policy is pursued, its not necessary to expand the capacity of the coal-fired generators in particular, so the fact that their legacy capital costs might not be covered is no threat to the real system. Its a financial loss, sure, but covering for that is just corporate welfare ~ in a more capitalist version of corporatism, we'd apply the rule that you pays your money and you takes your chances.
I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by Cyrille - Apr 12 26 comments
by DoDo - Apr 6 39 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 8 6 comments
by Oui - Apr 16 2 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 31 10 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 29 8 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3 157 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 27 5 comments
by Oui - Apr 162 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 1226 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 86 comments
by DoDo - Apr 639 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3157 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 3110 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 298 comments
by DoDo - Mar 279 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 275 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Mar 2066 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1818 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 1737 comments