The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
As to the pragmatic question of what happens if if where they end up on the merit order curve leaves them unable to cover their financial capital obligations ... someone ends up taking a financial haircut, and the asset is revalued, either internally or on sale, as back-up generating capacity.
If a sound energy policy is pursued, its not necessary to expand the capacity of the coal-fired generators in particular, so the fact that their legacy capital costs might not be covered is no threat to the real system. Its a financial loss, sure, but covering for that is just corporate welfare ~ in a more capitalist version of corporatism, we'd apply the rule that you pays your money and you takes your chances.
I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 45 comments
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 2045 comments
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments