Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Setting aside the crying over having fought for a false model of the future and having lost, boo fricking hoo.

As to the pragmatic question of what happens if if where they end up on the merit order curve leaves them unable to cover their financial capital obligations ... someone ends up taking a financial haircut, and the asset is revalued, either internally or on sale, as back-up generating capacity.

If a sound energy policy is pursued, its not necessary to expand the capacity of the coal-fired generators in particular, so the fact that their legacy capital costs might not be covered is no threat to the real system. Its a financial loss, sure, but covering for that is just corporate welfare ~ in a more capitalist version of corporatism, we'd apply the rule that you pays your money and you takes your chances.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Tue Jun 28th, 2011 at 05:37:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

Display:

Top Diaries

In which I defend Wolfgang Schäuble

by rz - Jul 15
24 comments

I'm done with the EU

by tyronen - Jul 13
228 comments

The Greece Blame Game

by Frank Schnittger - Jul 20
30 comments

The democractic insolvency

by rz - Jul 16
23 comments

Occasional Series