The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
One of the more controversial proposals, which saw "lots of discussions" among the 27 commissioners is the idea of having "tradable concessions" which fishing companies or associations can sell in order to reduce overcapacity of the European fishing fleet. It would mean that fishermen or fishing companies which have a licence to exploit the stocks of a certain country are allowed to sell these concessions to each other. Citing examples in the Nordic countries, Damanaki said the system would work "under strict rules" left to each member state to set out. She did admit, however, that one of the concerns expressed by other colleagues in the commission is that it would "be abused by the aggression of markets". Green MEPs and environmental groups however said that the plan is not bold enough to tackle the systemic problems of EU's fisheries policy. "The Commission's proposal to set up a market-based system to determine who has the right to fish is nothing short of scandalous," Spanish Green MEP Raul Romeva said in a statement. Speculation and the concentration of fishing rights in the hands of big companies will be a direct consequence of this policy, in Romeva's view.
It would mean that fishermen or fishing companies which have a licence to exploit the stocks of a certain country are allowed to sell these concessions to each other.
Citing examples in the Nordic countries, Damanaki said the system would work "under strict rules" left to each member state to set out. She did admit, however, that one of the concerns expressed by other colleagues in the commission is that it would "be abused by the aggression of markets".
Green MEPs and environmental groups however said that the plan is not bold enough to tackle the systemic problems of EU's fisheries policy.
"The Commission's proposal to set up a market-based system to determine who has the right to fish is nothing short of scandalous," Spanish Green MEP Raul Romeva said in a statement.
Speculation and the concentration of fishing rights in the hands of big companies will be a direct consequence of this policy, in Romeva's view.
No resource rent taxes, instead "licenses" to private "investors." We all can soon pay rent to banks from eating fish.
There may be merit in a "cap and trade" approach to fishing quotas, but the problem with the fisheries policy is not only the quotas, not even mostly. What cap and trade does is take the political component of the policy, which is the assignment of quotas, out of the hands of the politicians who are always making a mess of them.
Under the proposal, which still needs approval of member states and the European Parliament, a legal obligation to have fishing of each species not exceed its replacement rate should be put in place by 2015. Transition phases, compensations and subsidies to cushion the loss in jobs will be part of the package and agreed upon at a later stage. ... The proposal will seek to ban discards, dead or injured fish that are thrown back into the sea after being caught because they are too small to sell or belong to a different species.
Transition phases, compensations and subsidies to cushion the loss in jobs will be part of the package and agreed upon at a later stage.
...
The proposal will seek to ban discards, dead or injured fish that are thrown back into the sea after being caught because they are too small to sell or belong to a different species.
If it is true that fishing by traded concession will result in industrial fishing totally driving out small fishing enterprises, it is easier to regulate and police a smaller number of large industrial operations and have them bear the cost. I think the most practical way to police this might be having an inspector on board, which would be prohibitively expensive and impractical on a small boat.
Funny how they leave the compensations for lost jobs "to be agreed at a later stage".
Meanwhile, it's amazing that "fishing not to exceed the replacement rate" is not a requirement already, but it is unenforceable without the discard ban. Economics is politics by other means
What cap and trade does is take the political component of the policy, which is the assignment of quotas, out of the hands of the politicians who are always making a mess of them...
What cap and trade does, apart from not being a straight "tax", is take away the very political quota allocations from the political process. The only thing left to decide by the EU would be the total catch for each species, not how it's to be divided among the fishing enterprises. How it's to be divided among countries should be a interesting detail to watch when this thing gets to be under discussion. Economics is politics by other means
Access to the seas for fishing is a public good and maybe, given the tendency for overfishing, it shouldn't be free.
If there is a fixed supply (fishing quota), there are monopoly profits. Value created by the public.
..there are two alternatives, a tax, and cap-and-trade.
Cap-and-trade gives these profits to rentiers and banks. These rents do not even belong to the fishermen. They don't create this wealth.
..the very political quota allocations from the political process
Indeed. But i see no difference between political corruption and private rents. The money men capture the wealth in both cases.
Tax is simple, impartial and just. If some species is threatened, tax it more. And the wealth returns to wealth creators.
Cap-and-trade gives these profits to rentiers and banks.
Not if you auction the permits instead of handing them out for free. Handing them out for free is simply a subsidy to legacy players in the sector.
A combined tax and permit auction would probably be best: Use a tax to set what amounts to a floor under the permit price, then use auctioned permits to make sure that sudden price spikes don't make fishermen empty the seas in search for short-term profit.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
Yes, that still favours the deep pockets. If you want to protect traditional industry for the sake of protecting traditional industry, set aside a part of the permits for whatever activity you wish to protect.
We propose tradability at national level only, and we propose safeguards to protect legitimate public policy concerns like preventing too many fisheries interests to be concentrated in the hands of a few. And the small-scale fleet will be exempt, to prevent it from being absorbed by bigger operators.
The thinking is hopelessly muddled. The speech starts with
Our current system is not working in favour of sustainability. 75% of EU stocks are still overfished and a third of them are in a worrying state.
Europe needs more fish, more wealth and more jobs.
One hundred years ago the two most productive fisheries in the EU were the North and Baltic seas. (IIRC, cod in the first and herring in the second.) A combination of over fishing and pollution are putting paid to both and increasing sea temperature is hammering in the last nails in the coffin.
Canadian experience suggests you guys and gals are going to dither until the fish stocks collapse, your fishing industries follow, and THEN you'll be forced to do what you need to do: stop fishing until the ecology recovers.
If you don't you'll force the fish population ever to the right:
which, at some point, can easily drive the fish stocks to complete collapse, wrecking the ecology, and putting yourselves in a situation that will take hundreds or thousands of years to recover from. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
An almost devestated public good I think should be left alone to regrowth. That means a ban on fishing, investment in socially needed replacement jobs and reeducation of fishermen. And policing anything large enough to be profitable, in effect leaving rowboats with people fishing for their own table alone.
But then again I think coal mining should be banned.
However, the difference between European fishing and European CO2 emissions is that the CO2 emissions will be costly to reduce. How many work in fishing in Europe? How much of the food is from fish? A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
One way that contributes to giving responsibility back to the industry as well as to sustainability is a more market-based system of access to fleets. Tradable concessions have been introduced in many countries and proved effective in tackling overcapacity: for instance in Denmark the demersal fleet was slimmed down by 30% in 4 years and the pelagic one by 50%. Norway, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand also show success with this approach. We propose tradability at national level only, and we propose safeguards to protect legitimate public policy concerns like preventing too many fisheries interests to be concentrated in the hands of a few. And the small-scale fleet will be exempt, to prevent it from being absorbed by bigger operators.
Tradable concessions have been introduced in many countries and proved effective in tackling overcapacity: for instance in Denmark the demersal fleet was slimmed down by 30% in 4 years and the pelagic one by 50%. Norway, the U.S., Australia and New Zealand also show success with this approach.
by DoDo - May 20 36 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2036 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments