The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
However traffic volumes have been falling along the route in recent years partly due to the economic downturn, but also due to the fact that many quarries along the route are nearing the end of their productive lives. Although the Phase 2 route selection proposals just published for public consultation now thankfully avoid the immediate environs of Blessington Lake, they will still be very destructive of existing homes and farms and will remove even more of what is left of the Glen Ding hill and woodland overlooking Blessington.
This is despite the fact that the inner relief road within Blessington was never completed to connect to the N81 at roundabouts north and south of the town and has been grossly under-utilised as a result. It cannot be effectively used as a bypass of the town because there is no right turning lane or roundabout for it travelling south on the N81 at Blessington, and the onward connection back to the N81 south of the town was never built.
There simply is no need for an additional motorway standard road around and beyond Blessington because traffic volumes are falling, and Hollywood (population 500), Baltinglass (population 2,000 and distance 30 KM) and Tullow (Population 3,000 and distance 50 KM) are the only towns further along the route and even these are not included in the National Spatial Strategy as population growth centres. Indeed the Tullow area is already served by the M9 motorway for travellers or heavy goods vehicles who want to get to Dublin in a hurry.
All the possible routes proposed for the new motorway are convoluted and much longer than the existing N81 and will thus be of benefit to very few travellers. Most will simply continue to use the existing N81 which, with a few junction improvements and minor upgrades and an extension of the Blessington inner relief road is more than adequate for any realistic projections of future traffic levels.
The motorway proposal is a hangover from the Celtic Tiger era when there seemed to be no limits to public spending or population, economic and traffic growth, oil was plentiful and cheap, and carbon footprints were almost unheard of. It is being perpetuated by road planners who need to justify their existence but have simply run out of viable new motorway projects to pursue.
Why are we wasting money on planning such crazy developments and ignoring much simpler, more cost effective, and less environmentally destructive alternatives? It is time our planning systems took account of our changed economic circumstances and started planning for a more sustainable and lower carbon emissions future.
And if we do want to dramatically improve our public transport infrastructure, an extension of the Luas beyond Saggart to the Naas/Blessington area would be a good start. After all Blessington did have its own tram service until 1932. Index of Frank's Diaries
However traffic volumes have been falling along the route in recent years partly due to the economic downturn end of the boom, but also mainly due to the fact that many quarries along the route are nearing the end of their productive lives.
Changed to emphasise the non-temporary nature of this volume drop.
The motorway proposal is seems a hangover from the Celtic Tiger era when there seemed to be no limits to public spending or population, economic and traffic growth, oil was plentiful and cheap, and carbon footprints were almost unheard of.
Sharpened the focus on the fact that the justification is no longer there (I am not sure we want to associate the later years of the Celtic Tiger with "unlimited public spending"). Also, you cannot prove that the proposal is a holdover from the previous economic era - but you can prove that it sure looks that way.
It is being perpetuated by road planners who need to justify their existence but have simply run out of viable new motorway projects to pursue.
I would think very hard about whether I would want to make this accusation. If the point is simply to emphasise bureaucratic inertia, there are ways to phrase it that will not rub the people who make the decision you want to influence quite as much the wrong way.
Why are we wasting spending money on planning such crazy developments an entirely new road, and ignoring when overhauling the existing infrastructure is much simpler, more cost effective, and less environmentally destructive alternatives? It is time our planning systems took account of our changed economic circumstances and started planning for a more sustainable and lower carbon emissions future. And [I]f we do want to dramatically improve our public transport infrastructure, an extension of the Luas beyond Saggart to the Naas/Blessington area would be a good start. After all Blessington did have its own tram service until 1932.
And [I]f we do want to dramatically improve our public transport infrastructure, an extension of the Luas beyond Saggart to the Naas/Blessington area would be a good start. After all Blessington did have its own tram service until 1932.
Toned down the accusations, emphasised the technical and logistic superiority of your alternative proposal.
- Jake Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
However traffic volumes have been falling along the route in recent years partly due to the end of the boom, but also due to the fact that many quarries along the route are nearing the end of their productive lives. Although the Phase 2 route selection proposals just published for public consultation now thankfully avoid the immediate environs of Blessington Lake, they will still be very destructive of existing homes and farms and will remove even more of what is left of the Glen Ding hill and woodland overlooking Blessington.
There simply is no need for an additional motorway standard road around and beyond Blessington because traffic volumes are falling, and Hollywood, Baltinglass (population 2,000 and distance 30 KM), and Tullow (Population 3,000 and distance 50 KM) are the only towns further along the route and even these are not included in the National Spatial Strategy as population growth centres. Indeed the Tullow area is already served by the M9 motorway for travellers or heavy goods vehicles who want to get to Dublin in a hurry.
The motorway proposal is a hangover from the Celtic Tiger era when there were inflated population, economic and traffic growth expectations, oil was plentiful and cheap, and carbon footprints were almost unheard of. It is time our planning systems took account of our changed economic circumstances and we started planning more useful, sustainable and cost effective projects.
If we do want to dramatically improve our public transport infrastructure, an extension of the Luas beyond Saggart to the Naas/Blessington area would be a good start. After all Blessington did have its own tram service until 1932. Index of Frank's Diaries
by Migeru - Jun 15 39 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1539 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments