The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A lobbying row has broken out as the European Parliament decisively rejected yesterday (5 July) increasing the EU's 2020 CO2 emissions reduction target from 20% to 30%, on 1990 levels. The Parliament voted down a draft resolution after it was watered down by an amendment. According to Bas Eickhout, a Dutch Green MEP and rapporteur for the Parliament's position on EU emissions reduction targets, the vote was distorted by undemocratic lobbyists. "The German liberals did not follow the group line because of the heavy lobbying from industry," he told EurActiv. "BusinessEurope was aggressively lobbying against any change and within that, Eurofer for the steel industry was also acting very intensely." Because the pressure involved "small groups of industrial interests" who did not represent more climate-friendly businesses, it was "absolutely not an act of democracy," he said. The vote, which was postponed last month, saw a majority of 347-258 against the proposal, with 63 abstentions. But it only came after Conservative and centre-right MEPs passed a series of wrecking amendments, which forced the Green Party and Social Democrats to vote against it.
A lobbying row has broken out as the European Parliament decisively rejected yesterday (5 July) increasing the EU's 2020 CO2 emissions reduction target from 20% to 30%, on 1990 levels.
The Parliament voted down a draft resolution after it was watered down by an amendment.
According to Bas Eickhout, a Dutch Green MEP and rapporteur for the Parliament's position on EU emissions reduction targets, the vote was distorted by undemocratic lobbyists.
"The German liberals did not follow the group line because of the heavy lobbying from industry," he told EurActiv.
"BusinessEurope was aggressively lobbying against any change and within that, Eurofer for the steel industry was also acting very intensely."
Because the pressure involved "small groups of industrial interests" who did not represent more climate-friendly businesses, it was "absolutely not an act of democracy," he said.
The vote, which was postponed last month, saw a majority of 347-258 against the proposal, with 63 abstentions.
But it only came after Conservative and centre-right MEPs passed a series of wrecking amendments, which forced the Green Party and Social Democrats to vote against it.
The European Parliament yesterday (5 July) backed plans to let member states choose whether to ban the cultivation of genetically-modified (GM) crops on their territory, giving a detailed list of grounds on which such bans could be imposed. The House voted on Tuesday (5 July) to amend European Commission proposals for an EU regulation that would allow member states to restrict or ban the cultivation on their territory of GM crops, which have been given safety approval at EU level. The Commission's initial proposal suggested that member states could restrict or ban their cultivation on all but health or environmental grounds, which were to be assessed solely by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). But the proposals have sparked a wave of criticism, with businesses fearing they could lead to fragmentation of the internal market, bringing legal uncertainty for farmers. Some of the EU executive's proposals have also been deemed incompatible with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. The Parliament's report seeks to provide member states with "a solid legal basis" for banning GM crop cultivation, and to give them better legal protection in the event of challenges from trading partners opposed to bans. The report - adopted with 548 votes in favour, 84 against and 31 abstentions - lists a number of reasons to allow member states to impose bans. These include:
The European Parliament yesterday (5 July) backed plans to let member states choose whether to ban the cultivation of genetically-modified (GM) crops on their territory, giving a detailed list of grounds on which such bans could be imposed.
The House voted on Tuesday (5 July) to amend European Commission proposals for an EU regulation that would allow member states to restrict or ban the cultivation on their territory of GM crops, which have been given safety approval at EU level.
The Commission's initial proposal suggested that member states could restrict or ban their cultivation on all but health or environmental grounds, which were to be assessed solely by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).
But the proposals have sparked a wave of criticism, with businesses fearing they could lead to fragmentation of the internal market, bringing legal uncertainty for farmers. Some of the EU executive's proposals have also been deemed incompatible with World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules.
The Parliament's report seeks to provide member states with "a solid legal basis" for banning GM crop cultivation, and to give them better legal protection in the event of challenges from trading partners opposed to bans.
The report - adopted with 548 votes in favour, 84 against and 31 abstentions - lists a number of reasons to allow member states to impose bans. These include:
One year ago, European Commissioner for Climate Action Connie Hedegaard launched the proposal to unconditionally move to 30 percent cuts in carbon dioxide (CO2) by 2020. This step would make it substantially easier to achieve the 80-95 percent CO2 cuts that Europe wants to attain by 2050. Furthermore, projections made by the European Commission have shown that the European Union is on a trajectory of meeting the 20 percent cuts by 2020 without any extra effort by industry. The Parliamentary Comittee for Environment (ENVI), led by green Member of Parliament (MEP) Bas Eickhout, investigated the proposal and came up with an ambitious draft resolution. According to the resolution, the EU should pledge to cut its emissions by 30 percent by 2020. Limited offsets must be allowed, but 25 percent of the emission reduction should be achieved domestically. Moreover, the draft pointed out that this strategy could create up to six million new jobs in green sectors and provide a needed boost to the European economy. The draft resolution was approved in the Comittee on May 24, but still had to make its way through the plenary voting in the Parliament. The report did not survive the plenary. After an orchestrated action by a group of Conservative and centre-right MEPs, the proposal was watered down to such an extent that Bas Eickhout himself called for the rejection of the report. 'With a mere surplus of three votes, the conservatives voted in favour of amendments that took the core out of my proposal," Eickhout told IPS. One of these amendments stated that all emission reductions should only be achieved by saving energy, another amendment said that the proposed emission reductions should not be binding. "If the proposal would have been approved including the conservative arguments, we would have been warped back in time," said Eickhout. "In 2008, we had already agreed on a binding target of 20 percent by 2020. With the new amendments, the 2008 resolution would not make sense any more."
Mobile telecommunications firms will be forced to reduce the amount they charge for overseas data roaming to a maximum 80p (90 cents) per megabyte from July 2012, under EU proposals announced today. Customers will also be able to switch to other providers for their overseas roaming, leading to greater competition and potentially even lower charges, according to EU telecoms commissioner Neelie Kroes.Kroes announced that the cap on the cost to consumers of overseas calls and texts, introduced last week, will be lowered in each of the following three years. From July 2012 prices will drop for calls made from phones across Europe to 28p (32 cents) a minute; 25p (28 cents) from July 2013; and 21p (24 cents) from July 2014.But consumer groups have warned that the costs to networks of introducing the first ever cap on data roaming could be passed on to customers through price rises elsewhere. They also argue that the cap should be introduced immediately rather than in a year's time, and that 90 cents per MB is still too high - though the EU has announced further plans for this to be reduced to 45p (50 cents) per megabyte from July 2014.
Mobile telecommunications firms will be forced to reduce the amount they charge for overseas data roaming to a maximum 80p (90 cents) per megabyte from July 2012, under EU proposals announced today. Customers will also be able to switch to other providers for their overseas roaming, leading to greater competition and potentially even lower charges, according to EU telecoms commissioner Neelie Kroes.
Kroes announced that the cap on the cost to consumers of overseas calls and texts, introduced last week, will be lowered in each of the following three years. From July 2012 prices will drop for calls made from phones across Europe to 28p (32 cents) a minute; 25p (28 cents) from July 2013; and 21p (24 cents) from July 2014.
But consumer groups have warned that the costs to networks of introducing the first ever cap on data roaming could be passed on to customers through price rises elsewhere. They also argue that the cap should be introduced immediately rather than in a year's time, and that 90 cents per MB is still too high - though the EU has announced further plans for this to be reduced to 45p (50 cents) per megabyte from July 2014.
(Reuters) - Rupert Murdoch promised full cooperation on Wednesday to resolve a scandal shaking his media empire after British Prime Minister David Cameron promised an inquiry into what he called "disgusting" phone hacking by a newspaper. Responding in parliament to allegations that the News of the World eavesdropped on voicemail for victims of notorious crimes, including child murders and suicide bombings, Cameron said he was "revolted" and would order inquiries, probably into both the specific case and more widely into Britain's cut-throat media.The opposition, keen to highlight Cameron's own ties to Murdoch and to two former editors at the eye of the storm, noted that any inquiry would not start, let alone finish, for months if not years. Critics accused the Conservative government of trying to bury the embarrassment of the long-running saga.
(Reuters) - Rupert Murdoch promised full cooperation on Wednesday to resolve a scandal shaking his media empire after British Prime Minister David Cameron promised an inquiry into what he called "disgusting" phone hacking by a newspaper.
Responding in parliament to allegations that the News of the World eavesdropped on voicemail for victims of notorious crimes, including child murders and suicide bombings, Cameron said he was "revolted" and would order inquiries, probably into both the specific case and more widely into Britain's cut-throat media.
The opposition, keen to highlight Cameron's own ties to Murdoch and to two former editors at the eye of the storm, noted that any inquiry would not start, let alone finish, for months if not years. Critics accused the Conservative government of trying to bury the embarrassment of the long-running saga.
Is Rebekah Brooks gonna testify ? keep to the Fen Causeway
It's not going to happen, is it? Unless by some fluke a competing paper happens to offer millions for whistleblowers to come forward.
That's not likely either, because it would turn Fleet St into a blood bath - as opposed to the gin and coke bath it is now.
Still - let's see, shall we?
(Reuters) - European politicians accused credit rating agencies on Wednesday of anti-European bias after Moody's downgrade of Portugal's debt to "junk" cast new doubt on EU efforts to rescue distressed euro zone states without debt restructuring. European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the decision to cut Lisbon's rating by four notches so soon after it became the third country to receive an EU/IMF bailout was fuelling speculation in financial markets.The cost of insuring all weaker euro zone states' debt against default rose after Moody's move, announced on Tuesday.The euro and European shares fell, ending a seven-day stocks rally, and Portugal had to pay more to sell 3-month T-bills on Wednesday."It seems strange that there is not a single rating agency coming from Europe. It shows there may be some bias in the markets when it comes to the evaluation of the specific issues of Europe," Barroso told reporters in the European Parliament.
(Reuters) - European politicians accused credit rating agencies on Wednesday of anti-European bias after Moody's downgrade of Portugal's debt to "junk" cast new doubt on EU efforts to rescue distressed euro zone states without debt restructuring.
European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the decision to cut Lisbon's rating by four notches so soon after it became the third country to receive an EU/IMF bailout was fuelling speculation in financial markets.
The cost of insuring all weaker euro zone states' debt against default rose after Moody's move, announced on Tuesday.
The euro and European shares fell, ending a seven-day stocks rally, and Portugal had to pay more to sell 3-month T-bills on Wednesday.
"It seems strange that there is not a single rating agency coming from Europe. It shows there may be some bias in the markets when it comes to the evaluation of the specific issues of Europe," Barroso told reporters in the European Parliament.
Ireland's credit rating may be cut to junk by Moody's Investors Service after Portugal yesterday lost its investment grade rating, according to analysts. Moody, which slashed Portugal to Ba2 from Baa1, in April lowered Ireland's credit rating to the lowest investment grade Baa3 and left country's outlook on negative. The ratings company cut Portugal's rating in part because the nation may not be able to return to debt markets in the second half of 2013. Ireland has been locked out of markets since September, and the yield on 10-year Irish bonds climbed to 12.44 percent today, a euro-area record for the country that agreed to a rescue package with the European Union and International Monetary Fund last November. "If not re-entering the public funding markets has significance for a sovereign's rating, then clearly if our view proves correct, then Ireland will suffer an imminent downgrade," Cathal O'Leary, head of fixed income sales at Dublin-based NCB Stockbrokers, said in a note today.
Ireland's credit rating may be cut to junk by Moody's Investors Service after Portugal yesterday lost its investment grade rating, according to analysts.
Moody, which slashed Portugal to Ba2 from Baa1, in April lowered Ireland's credit rating to the lowest investment grade Baa3 and left country's outlook on negative.
The ratings company cut Portugal's rating in part because the nation may not be able to return to debt markets in the second half of 2013. Ireland has been locked out of markets since September, and the yield on 10-year Irish bonds climbed to 12.44 percent today, a euro-area record for the country that agreed to a rescue package with the European Union and International Monetary Fund last November.
"If not re-entering the public funding markets has significance for a sovereign's rating, then clearly if our view proves correct, then Ireland will suffer an imminent downgrade," Cathal O'Leary, head of fixed income sales at Dublin-based NCB Stockbrokers, said in a note today.
But seriously, why are the international rating agencies all in the U.S. of A.? One would think that Europe at least would have a say in how debt is evaluated, not to mention China...
It's like asking why (before AMD came along) the microprocessor business was monopolised by American firms like Intel and Motorola. Why, because the industry developed in the US. Economics is politics by other means
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
If the former, there is evident risk of malpractice in that the agencies pronounce judgement on their own clients. If the latter, why is this function not consigned to an international body?
Each day, a train 750 metres long leaves Barcelona station in Spain for Lyons in France. It moves at 40 kilometres per hour, which is slow, but speed isn't the primary virtue of rail freight. It will arrive at its destination in fifteen hours, a journey time only dreamed of a year ago. The line is aging and, in particular, there is a problem with the rail gauge which required moving the freight onto new cars at the French border. Madrid operates full steam ahead The Spaniards worked at record speed to fix the rails and, in December, a first convoy of container cars crossed the Pyrenees. Scheduled at three per week at first, there are now seven per week, thus contributing to lower air pollution and reduced road traffic. Today Spain is considering doubling the convoy timetable, convinced that supply will create demand.
Each day, a train 750 metres long leaves Barcelona station in Spain for Lyons in France. It moves at 40 kilometres per hour, which is slow, but speed isn't the primary virtue of rail freight. It will arrive at its destination in fifteen hours, a journey time only dreamed of a year ago. The line is aging and, in particular, there is a problem with the rail gauge which required moving the freight onto new cars at the French border. Madrid operates full steam ahead
The Spaniards worked at record speed to fix the rails and, in December, a first convoy of container cars crossed the Pyrenees. Scheduled at three per week at first, there are now seven per week, thus contributing to lower air pollution and reduced road traffic. Today Spain is considering doubling the convoy timetable, convinced that supply will create demand.
Keeping in mind Sunday's capsizing and sinking of a tourist boat in the Sea of Cortez off Mexico, it's worth asking -- to be fair -- what sort of complaint the Greeks might have had. In fact, "The Audacity of Hope" is a Greek inter-island water taxi, a craft never designed nor intended for an open water voyage across the Mediterranean Sea. Most of the seating (apart from fixed benches for sight-seeing facing the railings) was outside, plastic chairs under an awning in the stern. No showers. Squat toilets. Just a couple bunks below. The American captain claims the vessel was seaworthy but if any kind of weather had come up I don't think anybody could say for sure whether the vessel would have survived. Not to mention, if it had ever reached Gaza, whether the vessel could have survived being boarded by Israeli commandos.
A bad day for the eurozone's periphery, as bond markets react to Moody's latest downgrade of Portugal; Portugal's PM complains about a "punch into the stomach", as credit default swaps reached an all-time record of 914 points; EU government and the European Commission have threatened the rating agencies with reprisals; Michel Barnier was mooting the idea of a rating ban for countries subject to a European programme; the Paris meeting to improve the conditions of the French rollover plan descended into chaos; Wolfgang Schäuble relaunches his controversial bond swap plan given the no-compromise position of the ratings agencies; the Institute for International Finance proposes a bond buyback programme; George Papandreou sets up a cross-party committee to calm down political tensions; Christine Lagarde, in her first appearance as the IMF's MD, hints at lower interest rates for Ireland; she also calls on the Greeks to follow Portugal's example of a cross-party consensus in favour of reform; Schäuble seeks to increase privatisation revenues; Guido Bohsem attacks Schäuble for his failure to repair the German budget; Jean-Claude Trichet is today expected to announce his last interest rate increase; Wolfgang Proissl says ECB is engaged in a poker match to regain its credibility, but with uncertain outcome; the case against DSK continues after all; the affair is overshadowing Martine Aubry's presidential bid; Manuel Valls says the Socialist party's election manifesto was unrealistic; the Greek government, meanwhile, has invited Germany's president Christian Wulff to address the Greek parliament.
This column argues that the euro zone has no time to waste for structural reforms given the risk of default of Greece. The new excessive imbalance procedure (EIP) could play a crucial role in fostering such structural reforms. If needed, the Commission should start the EIP procedure as early as September should countries such as Spain not deliver on their reform commitments. The European Parliament and the public should monitor that the Regulation is applied forcefully and timely.
Policymakers have shown their resolve to significantly step up the governance of the euro area. The so-called "six-pack" consisting of 6 pieces of legislation is in the final stage of becoming effective EU law: the trilogue discussions between the European Parliament, Council and Commission close to final. The remaining differences between the Council the positions of the European Parliament as voted on June 23 should as soon as possible be resolved so that the package can be implemented early. The six-pack has a completely new "Regulation for the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances" (EIP), which has the potential to revolutionize European governance.
Finally, policy action to boost growth and domestic demand is also needed in current account surplus countries but the degree of urgency is smaller. The European Parliament and the public at large should hold the Commission and Council to account on these policy options. Let's make the EIP already a success in version 1.0 and not waste precious time.
The article ends with an afterthought in which reform of suplus countries' deflationary policies is also called "less urgent":
Shocking.
Guntram Wolff's work focuses on global macroeconomics, finance, the euro area economy and governance and Germany. He has joined Bruegel from the European Commission's DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, where he worked on the macroeconomics of the euro area and the reform of euro area governance. Prior to joining the Commission he was an economist at the Deutsche Bundesbank focusing on German and EU public finances, sovereign bond markets and macroeconomics of EMU.
by DoDo - May 20 23 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2023 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments