The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Lying? come on.
That's what it's usually called when people repeat factually inaccurate claims after having been repeatedly corrected in the past.
And you damit the point on deficits?
That Ireland is currently running a deficit, even when you take out all interest payments on the sovereign debt (which are odious subsidies to people who have more money than they should) and all the costs of guaranteeing anything beyond insured deposits and vital clearing functions in their banking system?
They probably are. They damn well should be, considering the rate at which their private sector is deleveraging.
That Ireland is running a structural deficit in excess of what is required to accommodate a sustainable growth path? I wouldn't know. I haven't run those numbers, or even formed a coherent idea about what a sustainable growth path would be for Ireland. I'm prepared to be educated if you are better informed than I am on such matters. But "pay back their national debt" is not a sustainable growth path.
Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
by DoDo - Dec 21 2 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 4 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 64 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 20 6 comments
by gmoke - Dec 2 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 19 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 26 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by DoDo - Dec 212 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 206 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 172 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 1564 comments
by das monde - Dec 1419 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments