The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Well yes. If you define all other economists, including Bofinger or Krugman as cargo-cultists, leaving only the members of your sect as economists, then you have majority.
That is a quite apt description of what the neoclassicals have been doing.
Incidentally, I never claimed that I had a majority on the issue of whether subsidising private bondholders reduced inflation. I claimed that I was right as a matter of fact.
Furthermore you seem to confuse the national asset stock with the national debt,
Uh, no. What I said is that the quote-unquote "national debt" is the monetary base. If you eliminate the "national debt," you eliminate all state money in the economy. And that would be bad.
monetary growth with a deficit,
The two are the same.
In this cause a balanced budget over the cycle would indeed be wrong, but I don't share your assumptions
Those are not my assumptions, they are how fiat currencies work. Go check the Bank of International Settlements Working Paper 292, p. 19-21 if you don't want to take my word for it.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by gmoke - Sep 27 9 comments
by gmoke - Sep 11 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17 138 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 4 8 comments
by Helen - Sep 6 66 comments
by gmoke - Sep 279 comments
by gmoke - Sep 25
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17138 comments
by gmoke - Sep 112 comments
by Helen - Sep 666 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 48 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 219 comments