The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
DSK would never have made that mistake but then, he's got other problems (and I'm not talking about his New York maid problems)...
Next year will be interesting indeed, suspect a lot of movement in advance of elections, as economists on left (well, our left) and right (borrowing heavily from Front de Gauche economists, this is probably woth a diary) both see the Euro for what it is, a hard shackle against growth, stablity and social equality around all of the EU save a couple of countries in the center (and I can only think of three or four...DE, NL, AT and LU).
If France detaches as well from the interested center of the Eurozone...well, then all things become possible.
But, as far as pushing for measures to stabilize the situation, I'd have less confidence in the things he would have done (spending side) than in what Aubry would do (revenues side).
Either way...PS is going to look a lot like the "socialists" down your way when push comes to shove. "Serious people from the ENA" and all that...
Back in January (of 2011), DSK was being interviewed by a BBC Radio journalist in the context of a documentary on the history of the IMF. Toward the end of the program, I heard the distinctive voice of DSK responding to a journalist's question about how the global economy ought to be reconfigured in the aftermath of the 2008 Crisis. His astonishing answer was:"Never in the past has an institution like the IMF been as necessary as it has been today... Keynes, sixty years ago, already foresaw what was needed; but it was too early. Now is the time to do it. And I think we are ready to do it!"This was, in my estimation, a bombshell of a programmatic statement by the IMF's Managing Director. What was he referring to? He was, of course, referring to Keynes' powerfully put argument (in the context of the 1944 Bretton Woods conference) that a system of fixed exchange rates cannot survive for long without an automated mechanism that treats (a) systematic trade surpluses and (b) systematic trade deficits as the different sides of a problematic coin.
"Never in the past has an institution like the IMF been as necessary as it has been today... Keynes, sixty years ago, already foresaw what was needed; but it was too early. Now is the time to do it. And I think we are ready to do it!"
As IMF head, no debate from me, better than what we had, better than what we have. Still not an ideal institution though, have spent most of their institutional life destroying economies with their "advice" and their "ultimatums" relative to the aid they mete out.
by epochepoque - Mar 7 7 comments
by afew - Mar 7 34 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 8 1 comment
by DoDo - Mar 1 13 comments
by maracatu - Feb 25 13 comments
by marco - Mar 3 43 comments
by Oui - Mar 5 60 comments
by Oui - Feb 24 32 comments
by Cyrille - Mar 81 comment
by epochepoque - Mar 77 comments
by afew - Mar 734 comments
by Oui - Mar 560 comments
by Oui - Mar 413 comments
by marco - Mar 343 comments
by vbo - Mar 123 comments
by Oui - Mar 11 comment
by Oui - Mar 13 comments
by DoDo - Mar 113 comments
by Metatone - Feb 287 comments
by vbo - Feb 27110 comments
by gmoke - Feb 263 comments
by vbo - Feb 25102 comments
by maracatu - Feb 2513 comments
by Oui - Feb 2432 comments
by Oui - Feb 2214 comments
by Oui - Feb 211 comment
by Katrin - Feb 2013 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Feb 202 comments