Display:
WSJ: The GOP Deserves To Loose
... It doesn't matter that Mr. Obama can't get the economy out of second gear. It doesn't matter that he cynically betrayed his core promise as a candidate to be a unifying president. It doesn't matter that he keeps blaming Bush. It doesn't matter that he thinks ATMs are weapons of employment destruction. It doesn't matter that Tim Geithner remains secretary of Treasury. It doesn't matter that the result of his "reset" with Russia is Moscow selling fighter jets to Damascus [...]

Above all, it doesn't matter that Americans are generally eager to send Mr. Obama packing. All they need is to be reasonably sure that the alternative won't be another fiasco. But they can't be reasonably sure, so it's going to be four more years of the disappointment you already know.

As for the current GOP field, it's like confronting a terminal diagnosis. There may be an apparent range of treatments: conventional (Romney), experimental (Gingrich), homeopathic (Paul) or prayerful (Santorum). But none will avail you in the end. Just try to exit laughing.

That's my theory for why South Carolina gave Newt Gingrich his big primary win on Saturday: Voters instinctively prefer the idea of an entertaining Newt-Obama contest - the aspiring Caesar versus the failed Redeemer - over a dreary Mitt-Obama one [...]

Then there is Mitt Romney, even now the presumptive nominee. If Mr. Gingrich demonstrated his unfitness to be a serious Republican nominee with his destructive attacks on private equity (a prime legacy of the Reagan years), Mr. Romney has demonstrated his unfitness by--where to start?

by das monde on Wed Jan 25th, 2012 at 09:00:13 PM EST
So far, this US election season looks like a series of experiments "What Happens When A Hopeless Favourite Faces Dreadful Challengers?"

The bastard kind of "What Happens When An Irresistible Force Meets An Immovable Object?"

by das monde on Wed Jan 25th, 2012 at 09:04:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I wonder if it will eventually dawn on the GOP party bigwigs that when you get to the point where every single candidate you put under the glare of a national campaign turns out to be some combination of liar, idiot, extremist philandering dogmatic bigot, and money-and-fame-grubbing-narcissist, and that none of them can articulate even a small subset of policies that aren't immediately ridiculed by everybody from Fox News to Mother Jones, perhaps the problem isn't the candidates but the fact that you have gathered together a set of platform planks that simply cannot make sense.

I doubt it.

by asdf on Wed Jan 25th, 2012 at 09:37:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Are they betting that the US won't meaningfully exist by the "eventually" time?
by das monde on Wed Jan 25th, 2012 at 11:59:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It's the inevitable result of nearly 2 decades of republicans in DC attempting to prove that govt doesn't work, while encouraging rush and Fox to anything that smacked of purpose and sense. While the ptpb may have quietly laughed at how effective idiocy could be, I don't think they realised that the most effective aspect of their work was convincing their own supporters that idiocy is the only way forward

this worked well when they still had people in DC who understood reality but were happy to go with corrupted flow. But now they're electing the bastard children of that idiocy who don't know any better.

They sowed the breeze and are reaping the whirlwind. Stupid is their name

keep to the Fen Causeway

by Helen (lareinagal at yahoo dot co dot uk) on Thu Jan 26th, 2012 at 02:50:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
You need 20 years of experience as a Republican politician. Anyone who has that is by definition an unprincipled shitbag and/or a fruitloop, with necessarily shady business dealings and/or unsavoury paymasters.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Thu Jan 26th, 2012 at 04:36:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series