The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 22 3 comments
by Oui - Sep 23 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 10 5 comments
by Cat - Sep 14 16 comments
by gmoke - Sep 19 1 comment
by ARGeezer - Sep 7 40 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 57 comments
by gmoke - Sep 24
by Oui - Sep 239 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 223 comments
by gmoke - Sep 191 comment
by Cat - Sep 1416 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 105 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 740 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 257 comments
by THE Twank - Aug 3110 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 2757 comments
by Cat - Aug 2222 comments
by Cat - Aug 2225 comments
by Cat - Aug 185 comments