The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 15 1 comment
by ChrisCook - Sep 14 30 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 9 47 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 6 10 comments
by Migeru - Sep 4 38 comments
by Metatone - Aug 30 4 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 151 comment
by ChrisCook - Sep 1430 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 947 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 610 comments
by Migeru - Sep 438 comments
by Metatone - Aug 304 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Aug 293 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by Metatone - Aug 227 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 2133 comments
by afew - Aug 1965 comments