The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by DoDo - May 1 18 comments
by gmoke - Apr 28 5 comments
by Bernard - Apr 24 26 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 30 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by DoDo - May 118 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 302 comments
by gmoke - Apr 285 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 278 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2426 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments
by marco - Apr 430 comments