The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 1 15 comments
by Metatone - Jun 29 50 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 28 32 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Jun 28 23 comments
by DoDo - Jun 23 22 comments
by das monde - Jun 26 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 20 355 comments
by melvin - Jun 15 60 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 115 comments
by Metatone - Jun 2950 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Jun 2823 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 2832 comments
by das monde - Jun 2620 comments
by DoDo - Jun 2322 comments
by gmoke - Jun 233 comments
by DoDo - Jun 214 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 20355 comments
by melvin - Jun 1560 comments