The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by Cyrille - Apr 12 24 comments
by DoDo - Apr 6 39 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 8 6 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 31 10 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 29 8 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3 156 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 27 5 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Mar 20 66 comments
by Oui - Apr 16
by Cyrille - Apr 1224 comments
by Cyrille - Apr 86 comments
by DoDo - Apr 639 comments
by aquilon - Apr 3156 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 3110 comments
by Zwackus - Mar 298 comments
by DoDo - Mar 279 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Mar 275 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Mar 2066 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1818 comments
by ARGeezer - Mar 1737 comments