The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Once the waters break, the chance of infection apparently skyrocket. At that point, the responsible medical response to preserve the life of the mother would have been abortion. To do nothing was to play russian roulette with her life. And, thanks to the hospital's gambling, Savita lost.
keep to the Fen Causeway
It seems undisputed that the hospital didn't cite medical reasons when they refused the abortion. They didn't say it would have increased her risk or something. They cited ideological/legal reasons. The Catholic country stuff.
Obviously the staff thought their risk of being prosecuted (or of having to answer nasty questions) was higher if they carried out an abortion. It is important to make sure that this is shifted, and that the staff becomes aware that refusing an abortion is an equally (at least) high risk, if there aren't compelling reasons for this refusal, which should be documented.
by DoDo - Sep 30 3 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 27 4 comments
by afew - Sep 22 10 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24 130 comments
by Migeru - Sep 21 33 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 19 27 comments
by DoDo - Sep 303 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2920 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24130 comments
by afew - Sep 2210 comments
by Migeru - Sep 2133 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1927 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Sep 18
by A swedish kind of death - Sep 1529 comments
by ChrisCook - Sep 1455 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 969 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 610 comments
by Migeru - Sep 438 comments
by Metatone - Aug 305 comments