The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So 'well, duh' would be entirely fair and accurate.
Certainly it's difficult to imagine any doctor without religious bias saying 'It's true you have a dead foetus inside you, but let's just leave it there and see if your condition improves, eh?'
It's true that Savita might have died anyway. But it's surely obvious that the odds of death would have been very greatly reduced to the point where it was very unlikely she would die - as opposed to the medical inaction which made it far more likely she would die.
So far as I can tell, medicine doesn't offer certainties.
But the reality is that any unbiased medical facility would have treated the situation as a medical emergency and aborted immediately, knowing this would tilt the balance of probability away from likely death to likely survival, and that this was a valuable and ethical thing to do.
by afew - Apr 20 46 comments
by ChrisCook - Apr 20 2 comments
by DoDo - Mar 19 19 comments
by DoDo - Apr 11 4 comments
by redstar - Apr 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Apr 1 33 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Apr 24
by ChrisCook - Apr 202 comments
by afew - Apr 2046 comments
by DoDo - Apr 114 comments
by redstar - Apr 219 comments
by gmoke - Apr 133 comments
by gmoke - Mar 26
by marco - Mar 2625 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1919 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1237 comments