The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So 'well, duh' would be entirely fair and accurate.
Certainly it's difficult to imagine any doctor without religious bias saying 'It's true you have a dead foetus inside you, but let's just leave it there and see if your condition improves, eh?'
It's true that Savita might have died anyway. But it's surely obvious that the odds of death would have been very greatly reduced to the point where it was very unlikely she would die - as opposed to the medical inaction which made it far more likely she would die.
So far as I can tell, medicine doesn't offer certainties.
But the reality is that any unbiased medical facility would have treated the situation as a medical emergency and aborted immediately, knowing this would tilt the balance of probability away from likely death to likely survival, and that this was a valuable and ethical thing to do.
by gmoke - Sep 27 9 comments
by gmoke - Sep 11 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17 129 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 4 8 comments
by Helen - Sep 6 66 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Sep 279 comments
by gmoke - Sep 25
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17129 comments
by gmoke - Sep 112 comments
by Helen - Sep 666 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 48 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 219 comments