The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So 'well, duh' would be entirely fair and accurate.
Certainly it's difficult to imagine any doctor without religious bias saying 'It's true you have a dead foetus inside you, but let's just leave it there and see if your condition improves, eh?'
It's true that Savita might have died anyway. But it's surely obvious that the odds of death would have been very greatly reduced to the point where it was very unlikely she would die - as opposed to the medical inaction which made it far more likely she would die.
So far as I can tell, medicine doesn't offer certainties.
But the reality is that any unbiased medical facility would have treated the situation as a medical emergency and aborted immediately, knowing this would tilt the balance of probability away from likely death to likely survival, and that this was a valuable and ethical thing to do.
by gmoke - Apr 28 2 comments
by Bernard - Apr 24 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 27 25 comments
by Bernard - Apr 6 5 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 2 57 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 30
by gmoke - Apr 282 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 276 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2725 comments
by Bernard - Apr 2425 comments
by gmoke - Apr 11
by Bernard - Apr 65 comments
by marco - Apr 430 comments
by fjallstrom - Apr 257 comments