The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So 'well, duh' would be entirely fair and accurate.
Certainly it's difficult to imagine any doctor without religious bias saying 'It's true you have a dead foetus inside you, but let's just leave it there and see if your condition improves, eh?'
It's true that Savita might have died anyway. But it's surely obvious that the odds of death would have been very greatly reduced to the point where it was very unlikely she would die - as opposed to the medical inaction which made it far more likely she would die.
So far as I can tell, medicine doesn't offer certainties.
But the reality is that any unbiased medical facility would have treated the situation as a medical emergency and aborted immediately, knowing this would tilt the balance of probability away from likely death to likely survival, and that this was a valuable and ethical thing to do.
by joelado - Oct 20 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 19 26 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 16 7 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 14 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 5 128 comments
by DoDo - Oct 2 10 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27 9 comments
by joelado - Oct 2011 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1926 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 167 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 141 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 5128 comments
by DoDo - Oct 210 comments
by gmoke - Sep 279 comments