The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So 'well, duh' would be entirely fair and accurate.
Certainly it's difficult to imagine any doctor without religious bias saying 'It's true you have a dead foetus inside you, but let's just leave it there and see if your condition improves, eh?'
It's true that Savita might have died anyway. But it's surely obvious that the odds of death would have been very greatly reduced to the point where it was very unlikely she would die - as opposed to the medical inaction which made it far more likely she would die.
So far as I can tell, medicine doesn't offer certainties.
But the reality is that any unbiased medical facility would have treated the situation as a medical emergency and aborted immediately, knowing this would tilt the balance of probability away from likely death to likely survival, and that this was a valuable and ethical thing to do.
by DoDo - Dec 18 1 comment
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 16 4 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 15 63 comments
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 20 5 comments
by gmoke - Dec 2 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 14 18 comments
by LEP - Dec 9 26 comments
by gmoke - Dec 17
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 205 comments
by DoDo - Dec 181 comment
by gmoke - Dec 17
by ReGiNuss - Dec 171 comment
by Democrats Ramshield - Dec 164 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 1563 comments
by das monde - Dec 1418 comments
by LEP - Dec 926 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 816 comments
by gmoke - Dec 72 comments
by rz - Dec 415 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28 comments
by A swedish kind of death - Dec 233 comments
by rz - Nov 3071 comments
by Migeru - Nov 2959 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 242 comments
by Cyrille - Nov 247 comments
by gmoke - Nov 1916 comments