The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
we in the west must have forgotten about because we weren't born when out grandmothers were giving birth without access to antibiotics
giving birth != miscarriage
In fact why our "grandmothers" (Early Modern ancestresses) died of infection in or after childbirth (and they did, massively) was because the physicians of the time infected them with dirty hands -- until antiseptic precautions became understood and standard. Poor women who could afford neither physicians nor midwives were better off because they did not undergo the intervention of professionals who came hotfoot, bearing pathogens, from other births.
Frank's diary suggested an iatrogenic e.coli infection, which prompted my comments above. However, if this were not the case, a miscarriage is sufficiently dangerous of itself, and this was a long, fraught miscarriage that did not conclude (except in the death of the patient).
Refusing to consider an abortion and leaving this woman to suffer with either insufficient monitoring or a deliberate decision (or both) not to place her life before that of a condemned foetus's heartbeat (when did they diagnose septicemia and realize they would save neither the mother nor the foetus?) was an evident dereliction of medical duty.
Poor women who could afford neither physicians nor midwives were better off because they did not undergo the intervention of professionals who came hotfoot, bearing pathogens, from other births.
Midwives were better at physicians, that was in part how Semmelweis discovered the importance of washing hands. And physicians came not only from other births but also from things like autopsies.
Best was probably having a midwive coming to the home. That was the practise up here until the physicians monopolised childbirths through legislation.
Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Despite various publications of results where hand-washing reduced mortality to below 1%, Semmelweis's observations conflicted with the established scientific and medical opinions of the time and his ideas were rejected by the medical community. Some doctors were offended at the suggestion that they should wash their hands and Semmelweis could offer no acceptable scientific explanation for his findings. Semmelweis's practice earned widespread acceptance only years after his death, when Louis Pasteur confirmed the germ theory and Joseph Lister practiced and operated, using hygienic methods, with great success. In 1865, Semmelweis was committed to an asylum, where he died of septicemia at age 47.
we reserve usually for those who come to show us what should be obvious...
"A fool with a tool is still a fool." - Abraham Verghese
by afew - Apr 20 46 comments
by ChrisCook - Apr 20 2 comments
by DoDo - Mar 19 19 comments
by DoDo - Apr 11 4 comments
by redstar - Apr 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Apr 1 34 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Apr 241 comment
by ChrisCook - Apr 202 comments
by afew - Apr 2046 comments
by DoDo - Apr 114 comments
by redstar - Apr 219 comments
by gmoke - Apr 134 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1919 comments