The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
we ... have heard no testimony for the medical team themselves. We haven't even seen the medical records.
How then can we even ask (but you do) this question:
Were the medical team correct in their assessment based on the available evidence
What assessment? What evidence?
no evidence of infection at that time
At what time? This took place over several days. Evidence of infection should have been constantly watched for during that time.
the very low incidence of septicemia following miscarriage in Ireland
What kind of miscarriage? This one wasn't over quickly, three days went by in which the risk of sepsis was constantly rising. This case called for careful monitoring and attentive reassessment more than once a day. It evidently didn't get it -- I see no reason to doubt the husband's testimony that it was only when his wife collapsed on the third evening that it was realized she needed antibiotics.
Of your three sets of allegations, religious bias and racism will be hard to determine, it will be one person's word against another's. But "a patriarchal medical system and culture that would rather have a woman suffer in acute pain rather than give her appropriate treatment and relief" seems to me clearly established.
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 16 20 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 8 53 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 9 16 comments
by Helen - Aug 2 15 comments
by Oui - Aug 6 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 17 147 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 29 94 comments
by Cat - Aug 2 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 1620 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 916 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 853 comments
by Oui - Aug 622 comments
by Cat - Aug 214 comments
by Helen - Aug 215 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 2994 comments
by Oui - Jul 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 17147 comments