The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
we ... have heard no testimony for the medical team themselves. We haven't even seen the medical records.
How then can we even ask (but you do) this question:
Were the medical team correct in their assessment based on the available evidence
What assessment? What evidence?
no evidence of infection at that time
At what time? This took place over several days. Evidence of infection should have been constantly watched for during that time.
the very low incidence of septicemia following miscarriage in Ireland
What kind of miscarriage? This one wasn't over quickly, three days went by in which the risk of sepsis was constantly rising. This case called for careful monitoring and attentive reassessment more than once a day. It evidently didn't get it -- I see no reason to doubt the husband's testimony that it was only when his wife collapsed on the third evening that it was realized she needed antibiotics.
Of your three sets of allegations, religious bias and racism will be hard to determine, it will be one person's word against another's. But "a patriarchal medical system and culture that would rather have a woman suffer in acute pain rather than give her appropriate treatment and relief" seems to me clearly established.
by gmoke - Sep 27 9 comments
by gmoke - Sep 11 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17 126 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 4 8 comments
by Helen - Sep 6 66 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Sep 279 comments
by gmoke - Sep 25
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17126 comments
by gmoke - Sep 112 comments
by Helen - Sep 666 comments
by epochepoque - Sep 48 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 219 comments