The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
we ... have heard no testimony for the medical team themselves. We haven't even seen the medical records.
How then can we even ask (but you do) this question:
Were the medical team correct in their assessment based on the available evidence
What assessment? What evidence?
no evidence of infection at that time
At what time? This took place over several days. Evidence of infection should have been constantly watched for during that time.
the very low incidence of septicemia following miscarriage in Ireland
What kind of miscarriage? This one wasn't over quickly, three days went by in which the risk of sepsis was constantly rising. This case called for careful monitoring and attentive reassessment more than once a day. It evidently didn't get it -- I see no reason to doubt the husband's testimony that it was only when his wife collapsed on the third evening that it was realized she needed antibiotics.
Of your three sets of allegations, religious bias and racism will be hard to determine, it will be one person's word against another's. But "a patriarchal medical system and culture that would rather have a woman suffer in acute pain rather than give her appropriate treatment and relief" seems to me clearly established.
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 20 1 comment
by gmoke - Oct 7 3 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 7 60 comments
by DoDo - Oct 3 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 29 19 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 29 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 27 4 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Oct 201 comment
by gmoke - Oct 73 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 760 comments
by DoDo - Oct 310 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 2925 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 2919 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 274 comments
by Cyrille - Sep 24136 comments
by afew - Sep 2240 comments
by Migeru - Sep 2133 comments