The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The "left" or what remains of it, seems to me to be crippled by a weird nostalgia for what never was.
LOL, you're a master of the trolly red-rag-to-a-bull.
Why do you care so much about the wheelchair-bound delusionary rump of the scare-quote left?
focus on labeling
I did so in that comment because you use labelling provocatively. If you only want reponses to your argument, only post your argument.
To which I reply below, and am to some extent in agreement with you.
So I would disagree, there never was a coherent line of thought, only worse or better narratives. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
The 1960s started with Jim Crow in full operation and ended in the Nixon era.
The '60s ended with Jim Crow over and done with, and Nixon thrown out of the White House - a couple of details your account left out.
Did the end of Jim Crow mean economic equality for African-Americans? No.
Did the end of Nixon mean a definitive step forward for democracy in America? No.
Was there greater "economic democracy" at that time than now? There was less income and wealth inequality, and the rise in lower incomes gave people the feeling they were part of society and not its garbage.
Was there more freedom? There were gains in freedom, and not only for middle-class white kids (and not only in America). The Civil Rights movement and radical middle-class white movement gave the impression the world was going to be changed. Was that impression confirmed by events? No. But it's not something that never existed, and neither was it insignificant.
I often see this theory, but I don't really see much evidence.
The Civil Rights Act was an important, historic step in the right direction, but not as a tool for economic democracy, certainly after the assassination of MLK. The women's liberation movement gave women options but has done little to close the pay gap and, in fact, the response by business seems to have been: "Oh good! Now we can require the wife to work for 2/3ds to 3/4rs of her husbands wage and thereby put pressure on rising wages." It would not surprise me to find this having been directly discussed by Chamber of Commerce leaders.
The ideal has largely been forgotten while the implementation of the progressive reforms have been implemented in ways destructive to the original intent but friendly to business, largely due to the influence of business organizations on governments through campaign finance and on public opinion through owned media and 'think tank' propaganda. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by Migeru - Jun 15 71 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Ted Welch - Jun 19
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1571 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments