The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The "left" or what remains of it, seems to me to be crippled by a weird nostalgia for what never was.
LOL, you're a master of the trolly red-rag-to-a-bull.
Why do you care so much about the wheelchair-bound delusionary rump of the scare-quote left?
focus on labeling
I did so in that comment because you use labelling provocatively. If you only want reponses to your argument, only post your argument.
To which I reply below, and am to some extent in agreement with you.
So I would disagree, there never was a coherent line of thought, only worse or better narratives. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
The 1960s started with Jim Crow in full operation and ended in the Nixon era.
The '60s ended with Jim Crow over and done with, and Nixon thrown out of the White House - a couple of details your account left out.
Did the end of Jim Crow mean economic equality for African-Americans? No.
Did the end of Nixon mean a definitive step forward for democracy in America? No.
Was there greater "economic democracy" at that time than now? There was less income and wealth inequality, and the rise in lower incomes gave people the feeling they were part of society and not its garbage.
Was there more freedom? There were gains in freedom, and not only for middle-class white kids (and not only in America). The Civil Rights movement and radical middle-class white movement gave the impression the world was going to be changed. Was that impression confirmed by events? No. But it's not something that never existed, and neither was it insignificant.
I often see this theory, but I don't really see much evidence.
The Civil Rights Act was an important, historic step in the right direction, but not as a tool for economic democracy, certainly after the assassination of MLK. The women's liberation movement gave women options but has done little to close the pay gap and, in fact, the response by business seems to have been: "Oh good! Now we can require the wife to work for 2/3ds to 3/4rs of her husbands wage and thereby put pressure on rising wages." It would not surprise me to find this having been directly discussed by Chamber of Commerce leaders.
The ideal has largely been forgotten while the implementation of the progressive reforms have been implemented in ways destructive to the original intent but friendly to business, largely due to the influence of business organizations on governments through campaign finance and on public opinion through owned media and 'think tank' propaganda. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by ARGeezer - May 24 2 comments
by DoDo - May 23 41 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by ARGeezer - May 242 comments
by DoDo - May 2341 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments