The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But I think there will be agreement and in less then thirty days there will be a new president.
So no cultural imperialism, please!
Th stern, for example has a list:
http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/kandidaten-fuer-die-wulff-nachfolge-wer-soll-bundespraesiden t-werden-1788056.html
1. Gauck 2.Lammert
OTOH, Merkel's probably still pissed off over the Gauck nomination last time, von der Leyen still has a political future and everyone's forgotten who Klaus Töpfer was. The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
As things develop, we will have results on sunday or so.
But we already knew that...
Schaüble for fuck's sake?? Or is this another Schaüble I don't know about? It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
"If it's all about party politics then it's an exceedingly poor way to select a head of state."
Yes. Could never happen in other countries.
And I have no idea why the SPD or Grünen would contribute to electing a CDU partisan. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
In most countries (I'm open to counter-examples) a president is expected to be above the fray of party politics. If picking a sitting minister is a serious possibility, then it's clearly not a consideration in Germany
We would expect them to switch to presidential mode the moment they are elected. If they don't manage that, we could try to force them to resign. By the way, all our presidents with only one exception were catastrophes.
And I have no idea why the SPD or Grünen would contribute to electing a CDU partisan
Because they can't dream of a majority without Die Linke. And a coalition with Die Linke is impossible because all members of that party are dirty and stink, and are stalinists, and eat babies for breakfast. So, Greens OR SPD can form a coalition with the CDU but not with each other.
That would be Heinemann?
On the other hand, I have no idea if the amnesia of both father and son was a deliberate ploy, or a shared state of denial.
When I say it makes no difference to the case, I meant the case whether Richard von W should be president again. He shouldn't (quite apart from his advanced age).
In most countries a president is picked put of a number of party politicians with a long political career. It is true that the politician is then supposed to be able to rise about party politics.
"If picking a sitting minister is a serious possibility, then it's clearly not a consideration in Germany."
Mostly partisan alingment and fitness to act as above parties are both taken into consideration. Scheel did go directly from minister to president, Weizsäcker from state prime minister to president. Others like Rau had some time without office, but that is not considered as necessary.
"And I have no idea why the SPD or Grünen would contribute to electing a CDU partisan."
Because they have no majority of their own in the assembly electing the president.
by Migeru - Jun 15 64 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1564 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments