Display:
This just shows the absurdity of UN food aid. If the idea is to feed the poor, the UN should of course buy the cheapest wheat they can find. But if the task is to subsidise poor farmers, they might just as well just hand out checks to them.

To me it seems it's all been muddled in true aid-inudstrial complex style, where it's about being "nice" without thinking of the consequences. And indeed, the PR trick works, with the media catching on the "evil big corporation angle" so popular amoing fasionable leftists who have no idea what the role of corporations actually are, only that they are evil. Then they head out shopping "chic" goods from those very same corporations.

Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.

by Starvid (arvid.hallen at gmail.com) on Wed Feb 8th, 2012 at 08:17:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The task is not to subsidise poor farmers, but to encourage local production by paying a decent price for produce - as opposed to the EU and the US subsidising their farmers and subsidising the export of grain that ends up undercutting local farmers in the countries it goes to. Feeding the hungry is not a matter of handing out the cheapest food available, but of local agriculture finding incentives to produce more and better food.

That should be the overall strategy - but, in the case of a famine like the Horn of Africa, buying up large stocks on the world market may be necessary to ensure survival rations for large numbers of people at a moment of crisis.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Wed Feb 8th, 2012 at 10:06:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:
Login
. Make a new account
. Reset password
Occasional Series