The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In the communique released by Garzón yesterday in response to the sentence he vows to fight not just his own conviction by the effects that the sentence may have as jurisprudence:
Esta sentencia, sin razón jurídica para ello ni pruebas que la sustenten, elimina toda posibilidad para investigar la corrupción y sus delitos asociados abriendo espacios de impunidad y contribuye gravemente, en el afán de acabar con un concreto juez, a laminar la independencia de los jueces en España. Acudiré a las vías legales que correspondan para combatir esta sentencia y ejerceré todas las acciones que sean pertinentes para tratar de paliar el perjuicio irreparable que los autores de esta sentencia han cometido.
Acudiré a las vías legales que correspondan para combatir esta sentencia y ejerceré todas las acciones que sean pertinentes para tratar de paliar el perjuicio irreparable que los autores de esta sentencia han cometido.
This sentence, without legal reason for it or proof to support it, eliminates all possibility to investigate corruption and its associated crimes by opening spaces of impunity and seriously contributes, in striving to finish off a particular judge, to erode the independence of judges in Spain. I will take the resort to the appropriate legal means to fight this sentence and I shall exert all pertinent actions to attempt to mitigate the irreparable damage that the authors of this sentence have committed.
I will take the resort to the appropriate legal means to fight this sentence and I shall exert all pertinent actions to attempt to mitigate the irreparable damage that the authors of this sentence have committed.
As for jurisprudence, it tends not to be very important. In fact, judicial interpretation of the law is generally frowned upon. Some people have called the ruling an attack on judicial independence because it tells judges they may be indicted for interpreting the law. However, Supreme Court and Constitutional Court rulings do constitute jurisprudence. tens of millions of people stand to see their lives ruined because the bureaucrats at the ECB don't understand introductory economics -- Dean Baker
by ARGeezer - May 24 4 comments
by DoDo - May 23 41 comments
by DoDo - May 25 1 comment
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 251 comment
by ARGeezer - May 244 comments
by DoDo - May 2341 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments