The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The firm changed the way it thought about leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence. What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the firm's "axes," which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) "Hunt Elephants." In English: get your clients -- some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren't -- to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don't like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym.
The firm changed the way it thought about leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence.
What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the firm's "axes," which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) "Hunt Elephants." In English: get your clients -- some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren't -- to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don't like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym.
My proudest moments in life -- getting a full scholarship to go from South Africa to Stanford University, being selected as a Rhodes Scholar national finalist, winning a bronze medal for table tennis at the Maccabiah Games in Israel, known as the Jewish Olympics -- have all come through hard work, with no shortcuts. Goldman Sachs today has become too much about shortcuts and not enough about achievement. It just doesn't feel right to me anymore.
Why else might he have written that letter? ... If he left under a compromise agreement, Jane Mann, head of employment law at Fox Williams, says it would been usual for him to sign a non-disparagement clause. Compromise agreements are common when employees are made redundant or move to a rival firm. They are usually a precondition to departing employees receiving all their unvested stock. ... Why would he have done this? Maybe it was, as the letter points out, simply because he felt Goldman had become morally dissolute. Other factors could possibly have contributed: Goldman is understood to have reduced salaries for many of its VPs and has been selective about who it who it allocates bonuses to. Was Smith affected? Apparently so: the Wall Street Journal says Smith's small bonus was a source of friction. Having come over from New York last year (possibly with a young family), it's also possible that Smith found his new role in London less appealing than he'd anticipated. After after spending 12 years at the firm, he hadn't been promoted to MD. In this context, if Goldman also cut his salary and reduced his bonus, he may have been justifiably put out. All this is speculation: we've tried calling Smith, but he's not answering the phone. It's always possible that Smith's salary and bonus were perfectly acceptable and he'd just had enough.
...
If he left under a compromise agreement, Jane Mann, head of employment law at Fox Williams, says it would been usual for him to sign a non-disparagement clause. Compromise agreements are common when employees are made redundant or move to a rival firm. They are usually a precondition to departing employees receiving all their unvested stock.
Why would he have done this? Maybe it was, as the letter points out, simply because he felt Goldman had become morally dissolute. Other factors could possibly have contributed: Goldman is understood to have reduced salaries for many of its VPs and has been selective about who it who it allocates bonuses to. Was Smith affected? Apparently so: the Wall Street Journal says Smith's small bonus was a source of friction.
Having come over from New York last year (possibly with a young family), it's also possible that Smith found his new role in London less appealing than he'd anticipated. After after spending 12 years at the firm, he hadn't been promoted to MD. In this context, if Goldman also cut his salary and reduced his bonus, he may have been justifiably put out. All this is speculation: we've tried calling Smith, but he's not answering the phone. It's always possible that Smith's salary and bonus were perfectly acceptable and he'd just had enough.
And his clients are muppets. We've known Goldman does this kind of shit for years. The obvious question is, Why is Goldman able to attract clients?
Look through the comments at the NYT. "I'm a GS client, and I can't get my money out or know anything about the proprietary fund I was sold! I lost 35% since 2008!" Who the fuck buys funds without knowing what's in them, aside from presidents and others who require blind trusts?
It sounds like it's really no different from the small-scale Ponzi schemes you see here and there every couple years. Except Ponzi schemes actually pay out in the early-going. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
So, a particularly vocal disappointed banker has left the fold. And not just any banker: a Goldmanite banker. He's been part of the empire firm long enough to get a top job in the US government see it change for the worse. Apparently.
If you haven't seen it already, self-proclaimed `stock market trader and forex trainer' Alessio Rastani, appeared on the BBC yesterday declaring, among other things, that Goldman Sachs rather than governments rules the world, that he's been, "dreaming" of a market crash for three years and that everyone's savings are about to be wiped out. ... And then - for a few hours - it looked like Rastani was a spoof. Robert Peston, the BBC's business editor admitted that Rastani may in fact have been one of the YesMen, a satirical duo specializing in posing as executives and making extreme comments in their name. Although Rastani has his own website and has written 1,700 tweets, he looks suspiciously like the Yes Men's Andy Bichelbaum, who appears here (also on the BBC) giving a spoof interview about the Bhopal disaster. It transpires, however, that Rastani IS real and that he merely resembles Andy Bichelbaum. The Telegraph has been to visit him in his 200k house in Bexleyheath, where he says he's not much of a trader but is an "attention seeker" who likes to talk.
And then - for a few hours - it looked like Rastani was a spoof. Robert Peston, the BBC's business editor admitted that Rastani may in fact have been one of the YesMen, a satirical duo specializing in posing as executives and making extreme comments in their name. Although Rastani has his own website and has written 1,700 tweets, he looks suspiciously like the Yes Men's Andy Bichelbaum, who appears here (also on the BBC) giving a spoof interview about the Bhopal disaster.
It transpires, however, that Rastani IS real and that he merely resembles Andy Bichelbaum. The Telegraph has been to visit him in his 200k house in Bexleyheath, where he says he's not much of a trader but is an "attention seeker" who likes to talk.
The idea that GS might once have had morals is pure comedy.
By my math, that's about 11 years ago. Be nice to America. Or we'll bring democracy to your country.
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 10 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by Metatone - May 14 84 comments
by gmoke - May 17
by DoDo - May 12 10 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by Migeru - May 7 8 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1610 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1484 comments
by DoDo - May 1210 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments
by In Wales - Apr 2136 comments