The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I see a conflict between an empirical and an idealistic approach. In the empirical approach wheter banks do or do not create spending power out of thin air is an empirical question that can be checked. In the idealistic approach wheter banks do or do not create spending power out of thin air is a question that is ruled by getting the simplest representation possible.
The idealistic models will thus have a preference for simplicity that is unchecked by empirical findings. Which then leads to oversimplification.
This may look terribly unfair, but Krugman is arguing that his description of banks is better because it has fever assumptions, without any reference to wheter the assumptions can be checked or not. And that is just straight out of scholasticism.
Or to put it another way, this is the impression I get when I read these articles.
Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by afew - Apr 20 46 comments
by ChrisCook - Apr 20 2 comments
by DoDo - Mar 19 19 comments
by DoDo - Apr 11 4 comments
by redstar - Apr 2 19 comments
by gmoke - Apr 1 33 comments
by ManfromMiddletown - Apr 24
by ChrisCook - Apr 202 comments
by afew - Apr 2046 comments
by DoDo - Apr 114 comments
by redstar - Apr 219 comments
by gmoke - Apr 133 comments
by gmoke - Mar 26
by marco - Mar 2625 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1919 comments
by DoDo - Mar 1237 comments