The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I see a conflict between an empirical and an idealistic approach. In the empirical approach wheter banks do or do not create spending power out of thin air is an empirical question that can be checked. In the idealistic approach wheter banks do or do not create spending power out of thin air is a question that is ruled by getting the simplest representation possible.
The idealistic models will thus have a preference for simplicity that is unchecked by empirical findings. Which then leads to oversimplification.
This may look terribly unfair, but Krugman is arguing that his description of banks is better because it has fever assumptions, without any reference to wheter the assumptions can be checked or not. And that is just straight out of scholasticism.
Or to put it another way, this is the impression I get when I read these articles.
A vote for PES is a vote for EPP!
A vote for EPP is a vote for PES!
Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES!
by ChrisCook - Sep 14 18 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11 129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 9 44 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 6 10 comments
by Migeru - Sep 4 38 comments
by Metatone - Aug 30 4 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by Metatone - Aug 22 7 comments
by ChrisCook - Sep 1418 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 11129 comments
by Luis de Sousa - Sep 944 comments
by Crazy Horse - Sep 610 comments
by Migeru - Sep 438 comments
by Metatone - Aug 304 comments
by Xavier in Paris - Aug 293 comments
by gmoke - Aug 26
by Metatone - Aug 227 comments
by eurogreen - Aug 2133 comments
by afew - Aug 1965 comments
by Oui - Aug 56 comments