The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
(Although that may be a little too cheerful and dynamic, considering.)
El Pais: Europa se obceca con la austeridadMerkel insiste en que hay que firmar el Tratado fiscal antes de poder generar crecimiento Europa ha jugado este jueves a las grandes palabras en una cumbre que servirá para consagrar la austeridad en los tratados y que viene a ilegalizar el keynesianismo, con la imposición de prohibir los déficits en las constituciones. Hasta aquí los hechos. Todo lo demás es retórica: los mandatarios europeos se han empeñado en un cambio de tono para tratar de convencer a la ciudadanía -y puede que a los mercados--de que los recortes no son la única obsesión en una eurozona muy maltratada por la crisis fiscal, pero que también va de cabeza hacia una recaída en la recesión. "Lo primero que hay que hacer es firmar el tratado fiscal. Lo segundo es ver cómo generar crecimiento", ha dicho la canciller alemana, Angela Merkel. Ese es el orden. Y "lo segundo" queda para más adelante: el Eurogrupo previo a la reunión de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno ha pospuesto una vez más la entrega del dinero del rescate para Grecia y su crisis interminable, y apenas ha debatido el llamamiento de España a flexibilizar los objetivos de déficit para evitar que el exceso de tijera acabe en un descosido para algunos países.Europe's dogged pursuit of austerityMerkel insists on the need to sign the Fiscal Treaty before being able to generate growth Europa has played the big-word game this Thursday in a Summit which will serve to consacrate austerity in the treaties and to outlaw Keynesianism, with the imposition of constitutional deficit bans. Those are the facts, the rest is rhetoric: European rulers went to pains to change their tone to try to convince the citizenry ---and maybe the markets--- that cuts are not the only obsession in a Eurozone battered by the fiscal crisis, but which is also diving head first into a renewed recession. "The first think that must be done is to sign the fiscal treaty. The second is to see how to generate growth", said the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel. That's the sequence. And "the second" is left for later: the Eurogroup before the summit of heads of stete and government has postponed once more the disbursement of the rescue moneys for Greece and its neverending crisis, and has barely debated Spain's plea to make the deficit goals more flexible to prevent a scissor abuse ending up leaving some countries naked.
Merkel insiste en que hay que firmar el Tratado fiscal antes de poder generar crecimiento Europa ha jugado este jueves a las grandes palabras en una cumbre que servirá para consagrar la austeridad en los tratados y que viene a ilegalizar el keynesianismo, con la imposición de prohibir los déficits en las constituciones. Hasta aquí los hechos. Todo lo demás es retórica: los mandatarios europeos se han empeñado en un cambio de tono para tratar de convencer a la ciudadanía -y puede que a los mercados--de que los recortes no son la única obsesión en una eurozona muy maltratada por la crisis fiscal, pero que también va de cabeza hacia una recaída en la recesión. "Lo primero que hay que hacer es firmar el tratado fiscal. Lo segundo es ver cómo generar crecimiento", ha dicho la canciller alemana, Angela Merkel. Ese es el orden. Y "lo segundo" queda para más adelante: el Eurogrupo previo a la reunión de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno ha pospuesto una vez más la entrega del dinero del rescate para Grecia y su crisis interminable, y apenas ha debatido el llamamiento de España a flexibilizar los objetivos de déficit para evitar que el exceso de tijera acabe en un descosido para algunos países.
Europa ha jugado este jueves a las grandes palabras en una cumbre que servirá para consagrar la austeridad en los tratados y que viene a ilegalizar el keynesianismo, con la imposición de prohibir los déficits en las constituciones. Hasta aquí los hechos. Todo lo demás es retórica: los mandatarios europeos se han empeñado en un cambio de tono para tratar de convencer a la ciudadanía -y puede que a los mercados--de que los recortes no son la única obsesión en una eurozona muy maltratada por la crisis fiscal, pero que también va de cabeza hacia una recaída en la recesión.
"Lo primero que hay que hacer es firmar el tratado fiscal. Lo segundo es ver cómo generar crecimiento", ha dicho la canciller alemana, Angela Merkel. Ese es el orden. Y "lo segundo" queda para más adelante: el Eurogrupo previo a la reunión de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno ha pospuesto una vez más la entrega del dinero del rescate para Grecia y su crisis interminable, y apenas ha debatido el llamamiento de España a flexibilizar los objetivos de déficit para evitar que el exceso de tijera acabe en un descosido para algunos países.
Merkel insists on the need to sign the Fiscal Treaty before being able to generate growth Europa has played the big-word game this Thursday in a Summit which will serve to consacrate austerity in the treaties and to outlaw Keynesianism, with the imposition of constitutional deficit bans. Those are the facts, the rest is rhetoric: European rulers went to pains to change their tone to try to convince the citizenry ---and maybe the markets--- that cuts are not the only obsession in a Eurozone battered by the fiscal crisis, but which is also diving head first into a renewed recession. "The first think that must be done is to sign the fiscal treaty. The second is to see how to generate growth", said the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel. That's the sequence. And "the second" is left for later: the Eurogroup before the summit of heads of stete and government has postponed once more the disbursement of the rescue moneys for Greece and its neverending crisis, and has barely debated Spain's plea to make the deficit goals more flexible to prevent a scissor abuse ending up leaving some countries naked.
Europa has played the big-word game this Thursday in a Summit which will serve to consacrate austerity in the treaties and to outlaw Keynesianism, with the imposition of constitutional deficit bans. Those are the facts, the rest is rhetoric: European rulers went to pains to change their tone to try to convince the citizenry ---and maybe the markets--- that cuts are not the only obsession in a Eurozone battered by the fiscal crisis, but which is also diving head first into a renewed recession.
"The first think that must be done is to sign the fiscal treaty. The second is to see how to generate growth", said the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel. That's the sequence. And "the second" is left for later: the Eurogroup before the summit of heads of stete and government has postponed once more the disbursement of the rescue moneys for Greece and its neverending crisis, and has barely debated Spain's plea to make the deficit goals more flexible to prevent a scissor abuse ending up leaving some countries naked.
[Rajoy] got a hostile response to [his and Guindos'] request to loosen the deficit target. The EU is just about to implement an auto-pilot fiscal pact, and is absolutely determined to stick to the target that everybody gets their public sector deficit down to 3% in 2013.That sentiment was summarised by the prime ministers of Sweden and Finland. El Pais quotes Frederik Reinfeldt as saying that the first to do after agreeing new budget rules cannot be to soften them." Jurki Katainen also said it would be "completely wrong" to expand the scope to reduce the deficit. So essentially, the eurozone follows a position that everybody knows is unfeasible, for fear of losing credibility. Nobody in Brussels wants to own to the fact that austerity is not working.
ElPais.com: Rajoy pide a Merkel que la UE ayude a España por ser un país que cumpleEl primer día tras su arrolladora victoria hizo lo mismo que la semana anterior: se escondió en su despacho, ofreció un discurso cerrado a sus dirigentes sin aclarar casi nada, evitó comparecer en rueda de prensa --pese a que muchos corresponsales habían ido a Génova convencidos de que hablaría-- y mandó en su lugar a Dolores de Cospedal, la secretaria general y presidenta de Castilla-La Mancha. Como si fuera un lunes más. "¿Quién es esta mujer?", preguntaban algunos enviados especiales de televisiones internacionales para cubrir las elecciones. ... "Rajoy le ha manifestado la necesidad de que los países que cumplan tienen que ser ayudados por las instituciones comunitarias. Le ha explicado que no todos pueden tener el mismo tratamiento, los que cumplen y los que no lo hacen", sentenció Cospedal, sugiriendo así que España, que según Bruselas es de los que está cumpliendo con lo que se la ha pedido, debería estar entre esos países a los que el BCE ayude con sus compras. ... "No vamos a hacer milagros y nunca los hemos prometido. La solución al problema de la deuda tiene que venir de una estrategia conjunta de la zona euro. Rajoy entiende que igual que España va a cumplir, tenemos que exigir que se nos reconozca ese cumplimiento. Lo que está claro es que España no puede seguir financiándose al 7%", remató.Rajoy asks Merkel that the EU help Spain as it is a country that deliversThe first day aster his landslide victory he did the same as the week before: he hid in his office, offered a closed-door speech to his party leadership without clarifying anything, avoided appearing before a press conference - despite many correspondents coming to the party HQ convinced that he would speak - and sent in his stead Dolores de Cospedal, the party secretary general and regional president of Castilla-La Mancha. As on any other Monday. "Who's this woman?", asked some special envoys from international TV stations sent to cover the elections. ... "Rajoy manifested [to Merkel] the need that countries which deliver have to be helped by the European institutions. He explained that not all can be treated the same, the ones that deliver and those which don't", asserted Cospedal, suggesting that Spain, which according to Brussels is fulfilling what was asked of it, should be among those countries that the BCE should aid with its purchases. ... "We're not going to work miracles and we never promised them. The solution to the debt problem must come from a joint Eurozone strategy. Rajoy understands that just like Spain is going to deliver, we have to demand that this fulfillment be recognised. What's clear is that Spain cannot continue to finance itself at 7%, she concluded.
El primer día tras su arrolladora victoria hizo lo mismo que la semana anterior: se escondió en su despacho, ofreció un discurso cerrado a sus dirigentes sin aclarar casi nada, evitó comparecer en rueda de prensa --pese a que muchos corresponsales habían ido a Génova convencidos de que hablaría-- y mandó en su lugar a Dolores de Cospedal, la secretaria general y presidenta de Castilla-La Mancha. Como si fuera un lunes más. "¿Quién es esta mujer?", preguntaban algunos enviados especiales de televisiones internacionales para cubrir las elecciones. ... "Rajoy le ha manifestado la necesidad de que los países que cumplan tienen que ser ayudados por las instituciones comunitarias. Le ha explicado que no todos pueden tener el mismo tratamiento, los que cumplen y los que no lo hacen", sentenció Cospedal, sugiriendo así que España, que según Bruselas es de los que está cumpliendo con lo que se la ha pedido, debería estar entre esos países a los que el BCE ayude con sus compras. ... "No vamos a hacer milagros y nunca los hemos prometido. La solución al problema de la deuda tiene que venir de una estrategia conjunta de la zona euro. Rajoy entiende que igual que España va a cumplir, tenemos que exigir que se nos reconozca ese cumplimiento. Lo que está claro es que España no puede seguir financiándose al 7%", remató.
...
"Rajoy le ha manifestado la necesidad de que los países que cumplan tienen que ser ayudados por las instituciones comunitarias. Le ha explicado que no todos pueden tener el mismo tratamiento, los que cumplen y los que no lo hacen", sentenció Cospedal, sugiriendo así que España, que según Bruselas es de los que está cumpliendo con lo que se la ha pedido, debería estar entre esos países a los que el BCE ayude con sus compras.
"No vamos a hacer milagros y nunca los hemos prometido. La solución al problema de la deuda tiene que venir de una estrategia conjunta de la zona euro. Rajoy entiende que igual que España va a cumplir, tenemos que exigir que se nos reconozca ese cumplimiento. Lo que está claro es que España no puede seguir financiándose al 7%", remató.
The first day aster his landslide victory he did the same as the week before: he hid in his office, offered a closed-door speech to his party leadership without clarifying anything, avoided appearing before a press conference - despite many correspondents coming to the party HQ convinced that he would speak - and sent in his stead Dolores de Cospedal, the party secretary general and regional president of Castilla-La Mancha. As on any other Monday. "Who's this woman?", asked some special envoys from international TV stations sent to cover the elections. ... "Rajoy manifested [to Merkel] the need that countries which deliver have to be helped by the European institutions. He explained that not all can be treated the same, the ones that deliver and those which don't", asserted Cospedal, suggesting that Spain, which according to Brussels is fulfilling what was asked of it, should be among those countries that the BCE should aid with its purchases. ... "We're not going to work miracles and we never promised them. The solution to the debt problem must come from a joint Eurozone strategy. Rajoy understands that just like Spain is going to deliver, we have to demand that this fulfillment be recognised. What's clear is that Spain cannot continue to finance itself at 7%, she concluded.
"Rajoy manifested [to Merkel] the need that countries which deliver have to be helped by the European institutions. He explained that not all can be treated the same, the ones that deliver and those which don't", asserted Cospedal, suggesting that Spain, which according to Brussels is fulfilling what was asked of it, should be among those countries that the BCE should aid with its purchases.
"We're not going to work miracles and we never promised them. The solution to the debt problem must come from a joint Eurozone strategy. Rajoy understands that just like Spain is going to deliver, we have to demand that this fulfillment be recognised. What's clear is that Spain cannot continue to finance itself at 7%, she concluded.
Spain is where Greece was two years ago: the previous year's deficit was revised upwards to everyone's shock, there are allegations that the figure was manipulated to look larger than in actually was (as in Greece). The difference is that now the Eurogroup doesn't even pay lip service to "helping out".
In other news, the moron Juncker is being replaced by the other moron van Rompuy. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
If Spain were to stick to the target, it would need to make a fiscal adjustment of 4.4% this year, and a further 1.1% in 2013, plus further adjustment as the economy will weaken during that period. As the country is already in a recession, exacerbated by private and public sector deleveraging, such a massive public sector retrenchment would land Spain in a depression. Spain is now where Greece was about two years ago.
La recaída en la recesión de la economía española sigue pasando factura al empleo. Según los datos de paro registrado que hoy ha publicado el Ministerio de Empleo, el número de desempleados aumentó en este mes en 112.269 personas, lo que representa su peor febrero desde 2009, el que hasta ahora es el año más dramático para el mercado laboral español en toda la serie histórica reciente (que arranca en 1997). Por el lado del empleo, la afiliación a la Seguridad Social cae en 49.710 personas, con lo que también marca su peor fenrero en tres años, y deja el total de inscritos en el sistema en 16,8 millones.
The Spanish economy's double-dip recession continues to take a toll on employment. According to data on registered unemployment published today by the Ministry of Employment, the number of unemployed rose this month by 112.269 people, representing the worst february since 2009, which so far is the most dramatic year for the spanish job market in the recent historical series (starting in 1997). On the side of employment, registration with Social Security fell by 49.710 personas, which is also the worst February in 3 years, and leaves the number of people registered in the system at 16,8 millon.
The migration to the core has begun, left parties better get started organising the migrants to vote in local elections, because the anti-immigrant parties will waste no time. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
If 10 % of the Greek population emigrates, and it distributes proportionally among the Northern half of the EU, Scandinavia plus Finland is going to get about 1 % of the current Greek population, or on the order of 50 thousand people.
This does not strike me as insurmountable.
- Jake Austerity can only be implemented in the shadow of a concentration camp.
If 10 % of the Greek population emigrates, and it distributes proportionally among the Northern half of the EU ...
Stop right there.
They won't.
Immigrants don't spread-out like melted cheese on toast. They will cluster. They will continue to cluster until they break the infrastructure of the cluster point or a backlash of rejection - social to physical - from the indigenous population raises the threat level to slow, halt, and/or reverse immigration.
Realize this IS what happens and review the recent history of Malmö for a local and on-going example. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
If Spain were to stick to the target, it would need to make a fiscal adjustment of 4.4% this year, and a further 1.1% in 2013
No. It. Won't.
Fucking idiots think they can remove 4.4% of micro-economic activity and keep the level of micro-economic activity constant.
FI think if they remove 4.4% of micro-economic activity they only reduce micro-economic activity by 4.4%.
Neither one is true, as we see from the "Greek Experience." Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
By many indicators, Greece is devolving into something unprecedented in modern Western experience. A quarter of all Greek companies have gone out of business since 2009, and half of all small businesses in the country say they are unable to meet payroll. The suicide rate increased by 40 percent in the first half of 2011. A barter economy has sprung up, as people try to work around a broken financial system. Nearly half the population under 25 is unemployed. Last September, organizers of a government-sponsored seminar on emigrating to Australia, an event that drew 42 people a year earlier, were overwhelmed when 12,000 people signed up. Greek bankers told me that people had taken about one-third of their money out of their accounts; many, it seems, were keeping what savings they had under their beds or buried in their backyards. One banker, part of whose job these days is persuading people to keep their money in the bank, said to me, "Who would trust a Greek bank?" The situation at the macro level is, if anything, even more transformational. The Chinese have largely taken over Piraeus, Greece's main port, with an eye to make it a conduit for shipping goods into Europe. Qatar is looking to invest $5 billion in various projects in Greece, including tourism infrastructure. Other, relatively flush Europeans are trying to make "Greece the Florida of Europe," Theodore Pelagidis, a Greek economist at the University of Piraeus, told me, referring in particular to plans to turn islands into expensive retirement homes for wealthy people from other parts of the continent. Whether or not the country pays its debts, he went on, other nations and foreign companies "now understand the Greek government is powerless, so in the future they will take over viable assets and run parts of the country by themselves."
The situation at the macro level is, if anything, even more transformational. The Chinese have largely taken over Piraeus, Greece's main port, with an eye to make it a conduit for shipping goods into Europe. Qatar is looking to invest $5 billion in various projects in Greece, including tourism infrastructure. Other, relatively flush Europeans are trying to make "Greece the Florida of Europe," Theodore Pelagidis, a Greek economist at the University of Piraeus, told me, referring in particular to plans to turn islands into expensive retirement homes for wealthy people from other parts of the continent. Whether or not the country pays its debts, he went on, other nations and foreign companies "now understand the Greek government is powerless, so in the future they will take over viable assets and run parts of the country by themselves."
And on and on and on.
For Greeks the Greek economy has become a Negative Sum Game, a Greek can only win if another Greek loses. For sufficiently well-capitalized outsiders it's a Positive Sum Game: they can't lose. Looking only at the econometrics and in the short term I grant this is a wash. Looking further, it's a disaster for Greece because it is literally selling the Greek future both the 'hardware,' e.g.,port of Piraeus, but, more importantly, the 'software,' the 20,000 people trying to immigrate because within those people are the Greek Creative Class and the Greek Educated Class without which Greece cannot create 'A Future.'
Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Isn't always the case with Greece that conversations go astray because almost no one wants to bring up statistics and discuss them. This is most likely the fault of the Greeks, but it's a strange world in which any deliberation is based on anecdotes or guesswork.
... and when they came for me there was nobody left to speak out.
By the time he wakes up to the reality of the situation all he will be able to say is "my God, what have I done?" - if he's indeed able to compose such a thought.
In the meantime PP accuses Socialists of fomenting student violence amid "climate of conflict" and they're not even hiding the fact that it's naked spin
Miembros del Gobierno reconocen que pretenden inutilizar a los socialistas como voz de denuncia ante los planes y los ajustes del Gabinete de Rajoy
Members fo the Government admit that they intend to disable the socialists as a voice of denunciation against Rajoy's government's plans and adjustments
Público, the major newspaper to the left of El Pais, is bankrupt and closing down its print edition.
The intention of publishing a new national newspaper was announced by Marco Travaglio on his blog, voglioscendere.it on 1 June 2009.[3] The title il Fatto Quotidiano was chosen as a homage to journalist Enzo Biagi,[3] who was purged from state television RAI at prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's request, and whose daily ten-minute prime-time news commentary on Rai Uno, named Il Fatto, was removed from programming. The newspaper could not just be named "Il Fatto" because RAI, the italian public broadcast vetoed it mentioning name ownership, even if its very management was the one who put it off the air. In June 2009, l'Antefatto,[4] a promotional website, was set up containing information about subscription and the development of the project.[3] The publisher stated he would not use the Italian state advertising and funding to run the newspaper, for which a newspaper needs support from at least some MPs, but instead he would use only money from sales and market advertisements.[3] The first issue, printed in 100,000 copies in addition to 32,000 subscriptions, was already sold out before 8:00 AM on 23 September, even though distribution was limited to the largest cities. As a consequence, the newspaper announced it would immediately double the number of copies and publish the first issue, free of charge, on the Internet.[5][6]
The intention of publishing a new national newspaper was announced by Marco Travaglio on his blog, voglioscendere.it on 1 June 2009.[3] The title il Fatto Quotidiano was chosen as a homage to journalist Enzo Biagi,[3] who was purged from state television RAI at prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's request, and whose daily ten-minute prime-time news commentary on Rai Uno, named Il Fatto, was removed from programming. The newspaper could not just be named "Il Fatto" because RAI, the italian public broadcast vetoed it mentioning name ownership, even if its very management was the one who put it off the air.
In June 2009, l'Antefatto,[4] a promotional website, was set up containing information about subscription and the development of the project.[3]
The publisher stated he would not use the Italian state advertising and funding to run the newspaper, for which a newspaper needs support from at least some MPs, but instead he would use only money from sales and market advertisements.[3]
The first issue, printed in 100,000 copies in addition to 32,000 subscriptions, was already sold out before 8:00 AM on 23 September, even though distribution was limited to the largest cities. As a consequence, the newspaper announced it would immediately double the number of copies and publish the first issue, free of charge, on the Internet.[5][6]
113,000 (70,000 copies sold daily, plus 43,000 subscriptions - 25 December 2009)
it's good quality too, pity no english version yet. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
I'm personally more concerned about a general descent into insecurity and day-to-day violence and criminality. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Or am I not allowed to ask that question?
In fact, to test the viability of this new pact, everyone should instantly adhere to the letter of the law, or otherwise admit there is a defect in the pact.
(Reuters) - The most telling thing the ECB did on Wednesday's leap day wasn't the 530 billion euros in party favors they handed out to banks, but rather the paltry sum they were forced to commit to shoring up Portugal's government bond market. ... Portuguese borrowing rates have remained stubbornly high and on Wednesday spiked higher, with 10-year borrowing rates above 13 percent. That brought the ECB into the market to make its first purchases of government bonds in two weeks. It may be that Portuguese banks are simply too weak to indulge in the government bond carry trade - after all they themselves have been unable to sell debt for two years. That being the case, there are simply no natural buyers of Portuguese risk left, save the ECB, and it may well be that the more the ECB buys the less anyone else will want to.
(Reuters) - The most telling thing the ECB did on Wednesday's leap day wasn't the 530 billion euros in party favors they handed out to banks, but rather the paltry sum they were forced to commit to shoring up Portugal's government bond market.
... Portuguese borrowing rates have remained stubbornly high and on Wednesday spiked higher, with 10-year borrowing rates above 13 percent. That brought the ECB into the market to make its first purchases of government bonds in two weeks.
It may be that Portuguese banks are simply too weak to indulge in the government bond carry trade - after all they themselves have been unable to sell debt for two years. That being the case, there are simply no natural buyers of Portuguese risk left, save the ECB, and it may well be that the more the ECB buys the less anyone else will want to.
(h/t Eurointelligence)
BTW, Krugman was in Portugal last week and totally made a fool of himself. I wonder what the adjective for his story is.
Buy him a dinner and he'll tell you anything you wanna hear!
Regarding salaries he said that if Germany does not inflate THEN the periphery as no other option other than deflate. but his preference would be for an increase in German salaries as opposed to Club-Med cuts.
The TINA attitude that since Germany is not willing to make the adjustments necessary to level the playing field, he proposes the only other alternative available is not coherent or principled stance.
Diary?
Are there videos or transcripts of the interviews? There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
what is it, 30T of CDS now resting on 'market confidence', and austerity, working to boost growth? The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
Severe instability of the eurozone would hurt everybody, also outside the eurozone. I therefore suggest that non-euro or non-EU European countries and other stakeholders like IMF, Switzerland, Russia and China take the initiative to get this urgent process going by asking the independent and qualified staff of OECD, BIS or EBRD to start working on the scenario of a breakup urgently. They need to analyse how the pain of a transition can be reduced, in individual countries and in the eurozone as a whole, how the financial system can avoid collapse in such dramatic times, and practical things around printing and issuing new money. They need to collect experiences that can be relevant from Ireland/UK and Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, where currency areas were reorganised. We cannot afford the risk of an unlikely but possible chaotic dissolution of the euro taking decision-makers by surprise and thus aggravating an already dramatic situation. Preparations should be made now, and by credible outsiders. I have respect for the risk that measures to prepare for trouble can become self-fulfilling. But years of avoiding the core, difficult questions have only led to a loss of credibility and a worsening of the crisis. We must now learn that lesson and let others step in, who are independent of prestige and vested interests.
We cannot afford the risk of an unlikely but possible chaotic dissolution of the euro taking decision-makers by surprise and thus aggravating an already dramatic situation. Preparations should be made now, and by credible outsiders.
I have respect for the risk that measures to prepare for trouble can become self-fulfilling. But years of avoiding the core, difficult questions have only led to a loss of credibility and a worsening of the crisis. We must now learn that lesson and let others step in, who are independent of prestige and vested interests.
The European Central Bank (ECB) has been working hard to convince the world that it is not competent to act as central bank. One of the main responsibilities of a central bank is to act as the lender of last resort in a crisis. The ECB is insisting that it will not fill this role. It is arguing instead that it would sooner see the eurozone collapse than risk inflation exceeding its 2.0 percent target. ... Fortunately, the Fed has the tools needed to prevent this sort of meltdown. It can simply take the steps that the ECB has failed to do. First and most importantly it has to guarantee the sovereign debt of eurozone countries. The Fed simply has to commit to keep the interest rate yields on debt from rising above levels where it risks creates a self-perpetuating spiral of higher debt leading to higher interest rates, which in turn raises the deficit and debt. ... Of course this sort of intervention will look horrible from the standpoint of the eurozone countries. It will appear as though they cannot be trusted to manage their own central bank and deal with their own economic affairs.
Fortunately, the Fed has the tools needed to prevent this sort of meltdown. It can simply take the steps that the ECB has failed to do. First and most importantly it has to guarantee the sovereign debt of eurozone countries. The Fed simply has to commit to keep the interest rate yields on debt from rising above levels where it risks creates a self-perpetuating spiral of higher debt leading to higher interest rates, which in turn raises the deficit and debt.
Of course this sort of intervention will look horrible from the standpoint of the eurozone countries. It will appear as though they cannot be trusted to manage their own central bank and deal with their own economic affairs.
Leif Pagrotsky is a Labour MP in the Swedish Parliament, Former Minister of Industry and Trade and Vice Chairman of the Council of the Riksbank in Sweden.
And as Minister of Industry and Trade he was one of the most prominent social democrats against Sweden joining the EMU. A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
More About Jens Weidmann's request to securitise Germany's Target 2 balance The entire Target 2 debate sounds very technical, but gets to the heart of the eurozone crisis. Jens Weidmann's proposal to securitise has led to hostile commentary in the press. Reuters Breakingviews writes that Jens Weidmann is more dangerous to the ECB than Axel Weber. If Weidmann was not concerned about a breakup of the EU, he would not need to talk about securitising Germany's claims on the eurosytem - which would only ever fall foul if the euro were to break up suddenly. The proposal is to make peripheral central banks to hand over their own collateral to the central banks with Target 2 surpluses. "But it could go down like a lead balloon with the weaker central banks. Not only won't they like their credit-worthiness being questioned, they would struggle to find collateral to cover anything like the entire exposure."
The entire Target 2 debate sounds very technical, but gets to the heart of the eurozone crisis. Jens Weidmann's proposal to securitise has led to hostile commentary in the press.
Reuters Breakingviews writes that Jens Weidmann is more dangerous to the ECB than Axel Weber. If Weidmann was not concerned about a breakup of the EU, he would not need to talk about securitising Germany's claims on the eurosytem - which would only ever fall foul if the euro were to break up suddenly. The proposal is to make peripheral central banks to hand over their own collateral to the central banks with Target 2 surpluses. "But it could go down like a lead balloon with the weaker central banks. Not only won't they like their credit-worthiness being questioned, they would struggle to find collateral to cover anything like the entire exposure."
Mark Schieritz makes an important in his commentary in Herdentrieb. He says the Bundesbank is effectively asking for a double collateral. If Greece were to leave, and were uncooperative, it would not deliver the securities it had promised. In either case, the Bundesbank's share of the claims would be lost. He says the only to avoid this is to carry the securities to Frankfurt, which would imply that you need to collateralise the surplus with gold holdings, which is hardly realistic.) If Greece, however, is co-operative, than the current system is perfectly adequate. He concludes that the Bundesbank must have come under massive public pressure through the Target 2, which has been raging in Germany.
Incidentally, the price of gold has never been higher. And central banks and the IMF/World Bank are buying right now. Gah!
Can we please apply some Raid to the gold bugs? They need to go away from the levers of economic planning.
(I recall especially statements some time ago just before Spanish bond sales...)
However, Mr Kenny said the Anglo debt question was an entirely separate matter from the referendum on the treaty. "These are entirely separate matters, in other words, the Irish people are not going to be bribed by anybody," Mr Kenny told reporters in Brussels. "That work is entirely separate from the treaty, and in due course the Government will set out a process by which this will be set before the people."
I recommend writing every voter a cheque for 10,000k. Cheap at the price, and a pretty good bit of stimulus for the economy. "Nice currency you got there, pity if it burned down."
All 17 countries in the euro zone and eight other European Union member states signed the treaty, which mandates automatic corrections of deficits that stray from targets. It is due to take effect on January 1st, 2013. ... "It's a strong signal that we've drawn lessons from the crisis," German chancellor Angela Merkel said before the signing ceremony.
"It's a strong signal that we've drawn lessons from the crisis," German chancellor Angela Merkel said before the signing ceremony.
Keynesian (Kaleckian, Minskian, Keenian...) economics is counter-intuitive. Plus, it's moralistically unsatisfying.
The hangover theory, then, turns out to be intellectually incoherent; nobody has managed to explain why bad investments in the past require the unemployment of good workers in the present. Yet the theory has powerful emotional appeal. Usually that appeal is strongest for conservatives, who can't stand the thought that positive action by governments (let alone--horrors!--printing money) can ever be a good idea. Some libertarians extol the Austrian theory, not because they have really thought that theory through, but because they feel the need for some prestigious alternative to the perceived statist implications of Keynesianism. And some people probably are attracted to Austrianism because they imagine that it devalues the intellectual pretensions of economics professors. But moderates and liberals are not immune to the theory's seductive charms--especially when it gives them a chance to lecture others on their failings.
The moment there is any sign that the total income stream may actually shrink, I should certainly not only try everything in my power to prevent it from dwindling, but I should announce beforehand that I would do so in the event the problem arose.... You ask whether I have changed my opinion about combating secondary deflation. I do not have to change my theoretical views. As I explained before, I have always thought that deflation had no economic function; but I did once believe, and no longer do, that it was desirable because it could break the growing rigidity of wage rates.
As I explained before, I have always thought that deflation had no economic function; but I did once believe, and no longer do, that it was desirable because it could break the growing rigidity of wage rates.
The Phillips Curve showed, Samuelson said, that if governments let unemployment rise then inflation would inevitably fall. Unfortunately it didn't. In the 1970s both unemployment and inflation went rocketing up, and none of Samuelson's followers could explain why. Milton Friedman said that the solution was simple. Governments should stop trying to manage their economies and other than controlling the money supply they should just let things rip. This became the cornerstone of Mrs Thatcher's policies in the 1980s, which culminated with the deregulation of the financial markets in the City of London in 1986 - which was called the Big Bang. Unlike the cosmologists and their Big Bang, the free market economists still believed that this explosion would lead to a stable equilibrium. They had a simplified, mathematical vision of human beings as creatures who logically analysed everything in the market, and then reacted as if they were computing machines. Few people at the time said that this might be an area that maths didn't really have anything to do with, and that the scope of equations like the Black-Scholes model - which made derivatives trading predictable - might be very limited.
The Phillips Curve showed, Samuelson said, that if governments let unemployment rise then inflation would inevitably fall. Unfortunately it didn't. In the 1970s both unemployment and inflation went rocketing up, and none of Samuelson's followers could explain why.
Milton Friedman said that the solution was simple. Governments should stop trying to manage their economies and other than controlling the money supply they should just let things rip. This became the cornerstone of Mrs Thatcher's policies in the 1980s, which culminated with the deregulation of the financial markets in the City of London in 1986 - which was called the Big Bang.
Unlike the cosmologists and their Big Bang, the free market economists still believed that this explosion would lead to a stable equilibrium.
They had a simplified, mathematical vision of human beings as creatures who logically analysed everything in the market, and then reacted as if they were computing machines. Few people at the time said that this might be an area that maths didn't really have anything to do with, and that the scope of equations like the Black-Scholes model - which made derivatives trading predictable - might be very limited.
no way! may the few become the many... The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
And unfortunately what got tarred was Keynes and not Hicks, Phillips or Samuelson. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
The Anti-Turing Test, as it were. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Insight: The dark side of Germany's jobs miracle
Wage restraint and labor market reforms have pushed the jobless rate down to a 20-year low, and the German model is often cited as an example for European nations seeking to cut unemployment and become more competitive. But critics say the reforms that helped create jobs also broadened and entrenched the low-paid and temporary work sector, boosting wage inequality. Labor office data show the low wage sector grew three times as fast as other employment in the five years to 2010, explaining why the "job miracle" has not prompted Germans to spend much more than they have in the past.
But critics say the reforms that helped create jobs also broadened and entrenched the low-paid and temporary work sector, boosting wage inequality.
Labor office data show the low wage sector grew three times as fast as other employment in the five years to 2010, explaining why the "job miracle" has not prompted Germans to spend much more than they have in the past.
Yes, critics do say that.
But they're not the German economic mainstream...
Meanwhile, the real situation of people with unstable job positions and insufficient pay (whether because of a low hourly rate or because of short hours, or both) is no improvement on being unemployed with benefit.
So, if it's "worth it", it's for the government and employers.
This is no longer the case: these workers have now unions of their own and strike for a rise of their own group's pay, but nobody else's. This means more strikes of groups who have the potential to efficiently strike, but an advantage for only few workers.
Of course, if unemployment goes down due to jobs with proper wages, then employees will want wage increases as they are no longer afraid of unemployment. And wage increases might mean inflation.
However, who is to say that that price may not be worth paying? A vote for PES is a vote for EPP! A vote for EPP is a vote for PES! Support the coalition, vote EPP-PES in 2009!
But unemployment has gone way down.
However, assuming the critics are right, who is to say that the price may not be worth paying?
That is a fact not in evidence.
Now the Greeks still can't pay. The exporters don't mind as long as they find other customers. The banks don't mind as long as Merkel squeezes money out of the Greeks. The Greeks are suffering enormously, but that doesn't diminish their debts. So in the end German workers will have to "pay the price". It's our pensions, our complete social net that will pay the price. By the time my fellow-citizens notice that not only Greeks can be squeezed it will be too late.
Governments tried breaking the upwards trend of unemployment since the 70ies. They failed, until the measures of the Schröder government.
The unwillingness to put the full power of the state planning apparatus behind the effort to eradicate deprivation should not be conflated with the impossibility of so doing.
"I've had some people earning as little as 55 cents per hour," said Peter Huefken, the head of Stralsund's job agency, the first of its kind to sue employers for paying too little. He is encouraging other agencies to follow suit. ... Data from the European Statistics Office suggests people in work in Germany are slightly less prone to poverty than their peers in the euro zone, but the risk has risen: 7.2 percent of workers were earning so little they were likely to experience poverty in 2010, versus 4.8 percent in 2005. It is still lower than the euro zone average of 8.2 percent. But the number of so-called "working poor" has grown faster in Germany than in the currency bloc as a whole.
Data from the European Statistics Office suggests people in work in Germany are slightly less prone to poverty than their peers in the euro zone, but the risk has risen: 7.2 percent of workers were earning so little they were likely to experience poverty in 2010, versus 4.8 percent in 2005.
It is still lower than the euro zone average of 8.2 percent. But the number of so-called "working poor" has grown faster in Germany than in the currency bloc as a whole.
"Now is there any new business," says Giblets."Well the boat's sinking," says me."Giblets seems to recall that coming up at the last meeting," says Giblets, "which would make that old business.""Well it's more sinking-er than it was last time," says me. "That's kind of new.""And under Old Business we agreed to form a Boat Sinking Committee to launch an investigation into the possibility of making a preliminary report on the subject of recommending the formal and official declaration of a Boat Sinking Committee," says Giblets."The Boat Sinking Committee has sunk," says me, "along with their half a the boat.""Well that wraps up the old business!" says Giblets. "Who wants a grilled cheese!""The boat's also on fire," says me."Perfect," says Giblets. "The water from the sinking and the fire from the burning will cancel each other out, leaving us standing on dry land.""I feel like there's something wrong with that but I can't put my finger on it," says me. "Because my finger would burn or drown.""Next order of business!" says Giblets. "Should Giblets grill his grilled cheese on rye bread or cheddar cheese loaf?""See, I almost wonder if this isn't the time for grilled cheese," says me, "what with the burning and the sinking and all the fire coming out of the cheese grill.""Cause cheese loaf is great by itself, but on a grilled cheese it might be overpowering," says Giblets."But I don't know whether to try to put out the fire or try to bail out the boat or scream and panic and scream," says me. "Come to think of it this is really the kind of discussion that calls for a Boat Burning Committee."
The house (EU) is burning down and TPTB are having an intense discussion about the plumbing. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
Directo | Rajoy: "El objetivo de déficit para 2012 será 5,8%" El presidente desafía a Bruselas con un objetivo por encima de lo exigido.- "Vamos a cumplir con el techo de gasto la recomendación de déficit excesivo que nos hizo la UE", asegura el presidente, la "reducción del 1,5 anual en el déficit estructural"
El presidente desafía a Bruselas con un objetivo por encima de lo exigido.- "Vamos a cumplir con el techo de gasto la recomendación de déficit excesivo que nos hizo la UE", asegura el presidente, la "reducción del 1,5 anual en el déficit estructural"
Live | Rajoy: "The deficit goal for 2012 will be 5.8%" The Prime Minister defies Brussels with a goal above what's demanded.- "We're going to meet with the spending ceiling the excessive deficit recommendation made by the EU", asserts the PM, the "reduction by an annual 1.5 of the structural deficit"
The Prime Minister defies Brussels with a goal above what's demanded.- "We're going to meet with the spending ceiling the excessive deficit recommendation made by the EU", asserts the PM, the "reduction by an annual 1.5 of the structural deficit"
But that's the mild bit. When the Department of Finance used the EU's method of estimating the `output gap' upon which the structural deficit is determined, they found a big big problem. `Moreover, further out the forecast horizon, the production function methodology [the EU method] implies a positive output gap - that overheating pressures are emerging, which does not appear realistic.' The Department used the EU method and found that the economy was overheating by 2015. Overheating?! Unemployment is estimated to be 12 percent, GDP has still to return to pre-recession levels, all the components of domestic demand (consumer spending, investment, etc.) are well, well below pre-crisis levels, we have more people - yet the EU says the economy will be overheating.
`Moreover, further out the forecast horizon, the production function methodology [the EU method] implies a positive output gap - that overheating pressures are emerging, which does not appear realistic.'
That's the actual government analysis.
European Commission Press Releases: Simulation technology could help prevent future financial crises (30 November 2009)
"This first class European research can help us make the move from the economics of pen and paper to the economics of super-computers," said Viviane Reding, EU Commissioner for Information Society and Media. " The results of this research project, will complement traditional economic statistics and assumptions about how economic actors react by enabling better testing of a policy's effects on people, while still on the drawing board. I expect government researchers and national research institutes will act quickly to put this tool at the disposal of decision- makers as soon as possible." This simulation technology developed by EU-backed research uses computer-based experiments to focus on the relationship between large populations of different economic actors across many interconnected markets. It is the first time this technology is applied on such a big scale using high-powered computing. Each simulated household (or business, or bank) will make different decisions in reaction to various monetary, fiscal or pro-innovation policies including, for example, whether to remain in a job or seek a new one, how much of a wage is saved, spent or invested. This means that the impact of one policy in one market at one point in time is no longer assessed in isolation from other factors. Traditional economics failed to predict the scale of the knock-on effect of the credit crunch on the world economy. The new software shows how banks react in different ways by looking at a wide range of factors like how much reserves they must keep compared to investments, their savers' consumption/investment and saving patterns, and psychological factors like confidence in the market. It can then give policymakers - who want to know how fiscal and monetary reforms will affect banks and customers - a better warning of the scale of a financial crisis' impact on the real economy. The software can also simulate the same scenario with an older demographic to help plan for an older Europe, or with limited energy supplies.
This simulation technology developed by EU-backed research uses computer-based experiments to focus on the relationship between large populations of different economic actors across many interconnected markets. It is the first time this technology is applied on such a big scale using high-powered computing. Each simulated household (or business, or bank) will make different decisions in reaction to various monetary, fiscal or pro-innovation policies including, for example, whether to remain in a job or seek a new one, how much of a wage is saved, spent or invested. This means that the impact of one policy in one market at one point in time is no longer assessed in isolation from other factors.
Traditional economics failed to predict the scale of the knock-on effect of the credit crunch on the world economy. The new software shows how banks react in different ways by looking at a wide range of factors like how much reserves they must keep compared to investments, their savers' consumption/investment and saving patterns, and psychological factors like confidence in the market. It can then give policymakers - who want to know how fiscal and monetary reforms will affect banks and customers - a better warning of the scale of a financial crisis' impact on the real economy. The software can also simulate the same scenario with an older demographic to help plan for an older Europe, or with limited energy supplies.
ECB: Smets-Wouters (2003) Model
Recent developments in the construction, simulation and estimation of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models have made it possible to combine a rigorous microeconomic derivation of the behavioural equations of macro models with an empirically plausible calibration or estimation which fits the main features of the macroeconomic time series. The main difference between empirical DSGE models and the more traditional macroeconometric models (such as the AWM) is that both the parameters and the shocks to the structural equations are related to deeper structural parameters describing household preferences and technological and institutional constraints. ... For these reasons, staff at the ECB and the Eurosystem have started to develop empirical DSGE models for monetary policy analysis. The Smets-Wouters (2003) Model is an example of such a medium-sized DSGE model, which has been estimated on the basis of quarterly euro area macro data. The model features three types of economic agents: households, firms and the central bank. Households decide how much to consume, how much to invest and how much to work and at what wage. Firms employ workers and capital and decide how much to produce and at what price to sell their products.
The main difference between empirical DSGE models and the more traditional macroeconometric models (such as the AWM) is that both the parameters and the shocks to the structural equations are related to deeper structural parameters describing household preferences and technological and institutional constraints.
For these reasons, staff at the ECB and the Eurosystem have started to develop empirical DSGE models for monetary policy analysis. The Smets-Wouters (2003) Model is an example of such a medium-sized DSGE model, which has been estimated on the basis of quarterly euro area macro data. The model features three types of economic agents: households, firms and the central bank. Households decide how much to consume, how much to invest and how much to work and at what wage. Firms employ workers and capital and decide how much to produce and at what price to sell their products.
Irish economy overheat in a few years
The target of 5.8 percent is 1.4 percent above that previously agreed with the Commission Merkel says changed figure makes "no sense" but market reaction muted Government expects economy to contract 1.7 percent this year
Merkel says changed figure makes "no sense" but market reaction muted
Government expects economy to contract 1.7 percent this year
Oh, and
The government expects the jobless rate to rise to 24.3 percent this year from 22.85 percent at the end of last year, with the economy shedding a net 630,000 jobs. De Guindos said he "wouldn`t be so bold" as to predict the number of people out of work would hit six million this year after the record 5.3 million at the end of last year.
by Migeru - Jun 15 39 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1539 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 417 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments