Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Well, this from the wikipedia page on 99Tc is misdirection:
Due to its high fission yield, relatively long half-life, and mobility in the environment, technetium-99 is one of the more significant components of nuclear waste. Measured in becquerels per amount of spent fuel, it is the dominant producer of radiation in the period from about 104 to 106 years after the creation of the nuclear waste.[2] The next shortest-lived fission product is samarium-151 with a halflife of 90 years, though a number of actinides produced by neutron capture have halflives in the intermediate range.
given that
Since nuclear fuel is used for several years (burnup) in a nuclear power plant, the final amount of 151Sm in the spent nuclear fuel at discharge is only a small fraction of the total 151Sm produced during the use of the fuel. According to one study, the mass fraction of Sm-151 in spent fuel is about 0.0025 for heavy loading of MOX fuel and about half that for uranium fuel, which is roughly two orders of magnitude less than the mass fraction of about .15 for the medium-lived fission product Cs-137.[3] The decay energy of151Sm is also about an order of magnitude less than that of 137Cs. The low yield, low survival rate, and low decay energy mean that 151Sm has insignificant nuclear waste impact compared to the two main medium-lived fission products 137Cs and 90Sr.
The half-lives of 137Cs and 90Sr are about 30 years.

There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
by Migeru (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Mon Mar 26th, 2012 at 03:59:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Yeah, I was thinking more about this after I made the above comment. I think a technology that mitigates Tc might be particularly useful in reprocessing scenarios as the strontium, cesium, and U components can be dealt with, whereas the Tc crap often ends up in the environment.
All too frequently I hear from nuke advocates: beta pollution is no big deal, and dilution makes it irrelevant. That always pisses me off, but when they turn around and announce: 'look how wonderful we are for limiting beta pollution and distribution'  I just have to roll my eyes and sigh.
I guess I just reached a point 15 years ago or so where I just assume that everything that comes from a nuke industry mouth-piece is a lie if you look deeply enough. But the fact is that a little truth may leak out from time to time.
by Andhakari on Mon Mar 26th, 2012 at 05:12:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Andhakari:
But the fact is that a little truth may leak out from time to time.

... because no containment system is perfect.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Mon Mar 26th, 2012 at 08:35:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series