The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Any other words?
EurActiv: Delors points the finger at Europe's 'killers' (29 March 2012)
He said that the EU leaders of the eurozone were "morally responsible" for the crisis, and that they ignored his proposals, made in 1997 in his capacity of president of the Notre Europe think-tank, to coordinate economic policies. Instead, leaders only added the word "growth" to the name of "Stability and Growth pact", he said. "What nonsense, what folly, what irresponsibility!" Delors however confessed of having made a mistake, namely in believing that while federalism was not possible, cooperation could be an alternative. He further explained that what happened is that the common market with a common currency led to a greater diversification of productivity in the interest of Germany and to the detriment of others.
Instead, leaders only added the word "growth" to the name of "Stability and Growth pact", he said.
"What nonsense, what folly, what irresponsibility!"
Delors however confessed of having made a mistake, namely in believing that while federalism was not possible, cooperation could be an alternative. He further explained that what happened is that the common market with a common currency led to a greater diversification of productivity in the interest of Germany and to the detriment of others.
I had proposed the coordination of economic policies in 1997, when I was no longer president of the European Commission but a simple French citizen. I had proposed this as a consequence of the 1987 Delors report. It was not taken up: instead, "growth" was simply added to "stability". That is typically French, the French adore formal requirements. They returned home happy because "growth" had been mentioned. How irresponsible. Or what a fraud?
not really, you nailed it.
i get the same shiver watching cameron foaming in pariament about the crisis 'we' are experiencing, like his buddies aren't chortling in their caviar and champers, his partner in crime, nick clegg slumped beside him like a deflated balloon.
cognitive dissonance, a terrible waste of beautiful minds. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
you are obviously able to discern something which is not apparent to the rest of us. Cameron is a prime example of government "of the 1%, for the 1%, by the 1%". He cannot see beyond his own small entitlement class, cannot see the problem of his idea that while increasing money motivates the rich, then increasing poverty must surely motivate the poor.
We are not in France 1788, but probably entering the 1780s keep to the Fen Causeway
Forwards or backwards? guaranteed to evoke a violent reaction from police is to challenge their right to "define the situation." --- David Graeber citing Marc Cooper
dave was getting hot under the collar, and ed was tanning his hide in parliament.
all kabuki of course... The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
But there is something that I personally under-estimated, I must admit, because knowing that we could not go any further with federalism, I believed in cooperation - in the context of the triptych: "competition, cooperation, solidarity". I believed in cooperation and I was wrong. During this period, the Single Market with the Single Currency had given rise to an increasingly large diversification, a specification of production, to the benefit of some countries, of which Germany, and to the detriment of others. ... We know now the strength of Germany and I am absolutely appalled when I hear economists talking about comparable competitiveness as if it were possible to club together in the same model Germany, Portugal and Greece. Europe is founded on the concept of diversity, can it live with this diversity or will it have to accept the implicit domination of Germany and its rules?
...
We know now the strength of Germany and I am absolutely appalled when I hear economists talking about comparable competitiveness as if it were possible to club together in the same model Germany, Portugal and Greece. Europe is founded on the concept of diversity, can it live with this diversity or will it have to accept the implicit domination of Germany and its rules?
Europe is founded on the concept of diversity, can it live with this diversity or will it have to accept the implicit domination of Germany and its rules?
This is brazen power, the reality behind the "Franco-German couple" facade. For Sarkozy, the Germans were willing to put on the "France still matters" show known as Merkozy. For Hollande, they are willing to put a pretty ribbon round the austerity pact. With a superior smile, as they get on with beggar-thy-neighbour business as usual.
Unfortunately it seems to have replaced bombers with bankers.
(And it may also be worth reminding readers how the banking classes facilitated and funded the Nazis in the run up to WWII.)
And it may also be worth reminding readers how the banking classes facilitated and funded the Nazis in the run up to WWII.
And not just in Germany alone. The Anglo-US bank Brown Brothers Harriman and Prescott Bush were instrumental in providing investment and technology sharing, including the process for extracting gasoline from coal and producing tetra ethyl lead as well as synthetic rubber which was provided to Germany and withheld from US industry for several years.
IBM, Standard Oil, DuPont, and Ford, among others supported such efforts and then got to keep their assets in Germany after the war. Julius and Ethyl Rosenberg were executed for similar generosity towards the Soviet Union. US businessmen, especially Ford, were envious of how effectively Hitler dealt with the Unions and Hitler personally gave a medal to Henry Ford for his services to the Nazi regime. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Like the neutron bomb, the buildings are left standing while people perish. Ever since I learnt about confirmation bias I've started seeing it everywhere
extreme pride or arrogance. Hubris often indicates a loss of contact with reality and an overestimation of one's own competence
This is the sort of stretching of language that can only be accomplished by applying all those elements to someone's last name with the suffix -ize.
To [NAME]-ize.
by Migeru - Jun 15 39 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 17 20 comments
by Katrin - Jun 12 88 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 9 68 comments
by DoDo - Jun 9 22 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 11 64 comments
by Metatone - Jun 8 4 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 3 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jun 1720 comments
by Migeru - Jun 1539 comments
by Katrin - Jun 1288 comments
by DoDo - Jun 1126 comments
by Zwackus - Jun 1164 comments
by Jerome a Paris - Jun 968 comments
by DoDo - Jun 922 comments
by Metatone - Jun 84 comments
by DoDo - Jun 671 comments
by DoDo - Jun 418 comments
by Ted Welch - Jun 31 comment
by gmoke - Jun 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 3113 comments
by A swedish kind of death - May 3113 comments
by ceebs - May 2927 comments
by ARGeezer - May 2915 comments
by Zwackus - May 271 comment
by DoDo - May 2631 comments
by DoDo - May 2346 comments
by Metatone - May 1490 comments