Indeed. That is the core ideology of neoclassism. There are no unearned incomes. Monopoly rights, political privileges, are "real wealth" like the added value created by labour. But it goes further. Because all monopoly rights, political privileges, are real wealth, they should be sold and bought with money. Otherwise we would not have ideal "market equilibrium" and socially optimal wealth. Democratic government is an obstruction, it should get rid of.

Neoclassical equilibrium is not an equilibrium of production competition (controlled by "invisble hand"), but equilibrium of political power.

Looking back at J.B. Clark we can see that he could discuss the 'appropriation' of the lands of Native Americans so directly because in his youth that appropriation was in full final swing and because US triumphalism and sense of moral entitlement blinded his contemporaries to the monstrous nature of what was happening. The Franks had settled on underutilized land in the initial phases of their move over the Rhine and into the Roman Empire. William of Normandy had conquered England and killed Anglo-Saxons, but he had not killed non-combatants on any significant scale. While after the Civil War the USA consciously sought to destroy the main means of existence of the plains dwelling tribes and reduced their numbers to a small fraction of what they had been. But the vast majority of US citizens thought that this was necessary and right. Today the vast majority of US citizens consider the ongoing appropriation of their wealth by the FIRE sector of the economy to be necessary and right. Another 'appropriation' is in process.

As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

Yes, i agree to some degree with internet, but investment does not create land. Columbus' ships did not create America. Columbus' ships are capital that combined with labour create added value from existing space, that includes all existing universe that man has not made. If investment would create land, land would not actually exist. And it would be "capital" in economic sense. (That is also the neoclassical narrative = all market payments are from added value)