Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
When I was halfway through filling the news bits, I realised the information on today's European event is, in fact, FALSE.

Yes.

The Afsluitdijk was officially completed on the 28th of May, 1932. I had been looking at historic events on the wrong date.

However, curious readers will already have found that, even while the dumping of rocks was done, it wouldn't be officially opened until 1933.

So I guess have some leeway. A bit.

But well. Curious people want to know. There you go.

by Nomad on Mon May 28th, 2012 at 04:26:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I thought you were Bad Nomad for including a photo of one of those one-horned goat-killing windmills.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
by Crazy Horse on Mon May 28th, 2012 at 04:36:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Nothing bad about windmills on dykes. Windmills on dykes are like birds perched on electricity lines, it makes sense. To me, anyway. And the Netherlands has literally thousands of available kilometers for onshore wind on dykes (ondyke wind?).

But too bad: the waterboards don't find this idea too hot - while classical mills positioned on dykes form an ongoing tourist attraction, the modern heavy variant influences the safety norms of the structure. That means more hassle, more calculations and once built, it won't be easy to raise dykes any further.

Furthermore, lots of dykes are seeing upgrades at the moment. The Afsluitdijk as a whole is no longer considered "safe" for future sea level rise and will be revised and heightened the coming years. Wouldn't make too much sense to dot it with mills now.

by Nomad on Tue May 29th, 2012 at 04:50:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I wasn't actually commenting about ondyke windraeder, which i too believe is a very good idea.

windmills sited on dykes would be very high performing turbines, due to stronger winds and less turbulence. That means stronger foundations adapted to dyke needs would be feasible. For example, there could well be hybrid foundations using some of the offshore technologies, using piles or jackets.

There are methods to build to dyke requirements. Whether the tourist industry would agree is another story. As the costly reality of poisons for generation creeps into society, and after the next nuke disaster, high capacity factor wind turbines on dykes won't seem so out of place.

Further, there are already offshore scale turbines (with 120m + rotor diameter) on land in Belgium, The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany.

"Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin

by Crazy Horse on Tue May 29th, 2012 at 05:24:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Current Dutch law either strictly prohibits or massively hinders building on or near dyke bodies. At the initiation of the provinces, there is some research being done at the moment to see if incorporating windmills could actually strengthen the dyke's integrity. Haven't seen the outcomes.
by Nomad on Tue May 29th, 2012 at 05:54:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The horror!
by Andhakari on Tue May 29th, 2012 at 03:31:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Pentecost steam

by DoDo - May 20
9 comments

A Nomad's Life (A Farewell)

by Nomad - May 10
14 comments

Simple Solar Principles

by gmoke - May 17
1 comment

Rail News Blogging #24

by DoDo - May 12
10 comments

Ferguson hates on Keynes

by Migeru - May 6
100 comments

Occasional Series