Welcome to the new version of European Tribune. It's just a new layout, so everything should work as before - please report bugs here.
Display:
Good points about the preeminent importance of ensuring the sufficient structural gauge. But, if electrification is to be done later, I take the initial diesel traffic will be light enough to use one track during overhead line construction and testing (on the other track)?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 at 03:37:35 AM EST
Easily, the San Joaquin is a six train per day each way service.

If one were to build the Second Construction segment, and use the existing Antelope Valley line to complete the run to LA Union Station, the service would have to be hybrid diesel-electric service, since the Bakersfield to Lancaster segment will have tunnels and viaducts to get over the Tehachai pass that are not designed for diesels to pass through. So that bridge service (which is not in the CHSRA baseline, I must stress) would have to be electrified Palmdale through Bakersfield, and one might as well electrify the Bakersfield to Merced section to make a 200 mile electric section.

But absent such a bridge service, which would be time-competitive with driving but would not attract a lot of current air travel unless there was a petroleum crisis, the first electrification would be when the Express HSR corridor down into the LA Basin is completed and an Initial Operating Express HSR Service within the Proposition 1a can be started.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Jul 2nd, 2012 at 11:18:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]
On the existing dual-track ROW in the U.S., used almost entirely for freight traffic, there are a lot of crossovers between the two tracks. It is not at all uncommon to be going the "wrong" way for one reason or another.

Following that approach, it would be relatively easy to isolate one side for purposes of overhead catenary construction while using the other side. Although the workers would have to be pretty brave...

by asdf on Fri Jul 6th, 2012 at 10:41:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I don't know whether they will be using side supports or stanchions, but even if they add a service with the faster turn on the southern part of the San Joaquin corridor, its only seven trains per day. You can just pause work for 15 minutes when the train is approaching until its passed by. Operations like placing stanchions over the line could be done at night, since the San Joaquin does not run all night.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Fri Jul 6th, 2012 at 11:32:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series