The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Reason being that there is nothing that the Lib Dems won't do to stay in the coalition. They have reneged on their NHS promises, civil liberty promises - they will bend the knee and pass the boundary changes no matter what the Tories do on Lords reform - or indeed on any issue.
So the coalition will continue to the next election.
The Lib Dems will be reduced in numbers and we better pray we find a way to keep out a Tory government or we can say a further goodbye to the NHS and we'll find ourselves watching the Tories pass yet another gerrymandering bill, probably focused on the West Lothian question. Proposals are already circulating.
What do you mean in this context with pumadom?
Which in this case implies that the Conservative party will be torn apart in a fratricidal strife as the neoconservative near-UKIPs slug it out with the more liberal One-Nation Tories. I'm sure there will be some defections to UKIP, but tories as a breed are much less inclined to jump off a cliff into principled obscurity if it is likely to isolate them from the lucrative extra-parliamentary revenue streams which come as part of the remuneration package of a modern conservative MP.
so the fighting may be more savage as all sides are defending their corner. And thus more entertaining keep to the Fen Causeway
A total disruption of the Conservative Party, leading to a major reconfiguration of the party constellation seems quite unlikely.
A more likely possibility is of Cameron being deposed and spending the rest of his career as a discontented backbencher. However, if the Tories in the cabinet remain united, it is not obvious who would trigger a leadership contest.
The most likely thing is for the Conservatives to remain more or less united, until the next general election. If Cameron wins that, then he continues as leader. If not, he will then be replaced, with far less risk to the aspirants for leadership than a challenge in mid Parliament..
It's becoming more obvious now. The wayward curls, the sagging jowls, the general air of world-weariness and dogged determination. Just as animals and their owners grow to resemble each other, so George Osborne is slowly morphing into the man he most loathes in British politics, Gordon Brown.But the emerging physical similarities are where comparisons between Brown and Osborne end. Unlike most of his predecessors, Gordon managed to seamlessly move from Number 11 to Number 10. Osborne, exposed as less fleet of foot in recent times, looks increasingly like he will be forced from office amid the utter collapse of his economic policy as we sink back into recession.All of which presents an interesting dilemma for the government. In order to restore their credentials on the economy when `Osbornomics' becomes so discredited that even Michael Fallon refuses to take to the airwaves to defend it, the government will need a new salesman to flog its new economic direction.
It's becoming more obvious now. The wayward curls, the sagging jowls, the general air of world-weariness and dogged determination. Just as animals and their owners grow to resemble each other, so George Osborne is slowly morphing into the man he most loathes in British politics, Gordon Brown.
But the emerging physical similarities are where comparisons between Brown and Osborne end. Unlike most of his predecessors, Gordon managed to seamlessly move from Number 11 to Number 10. Osborne, exposed as less fleet of foot in recent times, looks increasingly like he will be forced from office amid the utter collapse of his economic policy as we sink back into recession.
All of which presents an interesting dilemma for the government. In order to restore their credentials on the economy when `Osbornomics' becomes so discredited that even Michael Fallon refuses to take to the airwaves to defend it, the government will need a new salesman to flog its new economic direction.
(Simple answers, etc.)
The closest thing seems to be Ed Balls.
Which is not necessarily a recommendation.
the tory right on the other hand are cougars!
You mean, they like getting bonked by young men?
That's such an old-fashioned stereotype, my dear. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Cameron will happily keep throwing bones to the right to stay in power.
Yes, electoral oblivion awaits, but that will happen anyway. They might at least salvage something if they walk away saying "we tried but when it was unbearable we wlaked". Simply becoming lobby fodder for the Tories may be a bridge too far, even for the LDs keep to the Fen Causeway
Even after a term with Gordo the Unpopular, the best the Tories could do was scrape into power on the back of an opportunist turn-coat from a party many of them despise.
I think the Lib Dems have already alienated at least two thirds of their likely voters, and what's left isn't much.
A few of the right-wingers will likely to defect to the Tories, where some of them may even keep their seats. A rump of die-hard independents with little influence will be left.
So the next election will be a straight Labour/Tory fight. Unless Milliband gets something horribly wrong, Labour will pick off many of the unpopular Lib Dems in constituencies that used to be LD vs Tory.
Tories will consolidate the rest, but with some serious bleeding to UKIP.
So even if the coalition survives to 2015, it has almost no chance of getting through the next election. There simply won't be enough LD MPs to matter and the Tories are insane if they think they can win a straight majority without them.
We can expect the Tories to play the Europhobic anti-immigrant cards, but the economy will surely be in an even worse state than it is now, and at best that's going to be a rearguard action.
The next election is Labour's to lose.
I think most of the LDs will continue to hang in there for now, because it's better to have a job than not have a job. But the cracks will become increasingly obvious next year.
The real danger isn't from the Lib Dems leaving but from the Rabid Right getting too ambitious. If that happens things could fall apart very quickly.
The odds of the economy turning before then around despite the worst efforts of the UK government are fairly good
Uh - no. They really aren't.
There is no growth base. Even if the ConDems throw money at infrastructure - which is not a bad idea - their ideology means they'll have to raise taxes to pay for the spending.
Retail is dying, manufacturing is hanging in there but not improving, and Cameron seems obsessed with dinky little know-nothing start-ups, when he could spending useful money on better broadband and giving non-dinky IT entrepreneurs access to better funding.
So to repeat - there is no growth base. Resource prices will continue to increase, with taxes. Benefits and the NHS will be cut.
None of these make for an improved feel-good factor going into 2015.
And that's before the remaining bankster price fixing stories hit the news, and Cameron is seen trying to apologise for them.
Well, that would seem to be a "quasi-external" boom, given the dominant influence of the EU economy as a whole in that.
So, what are the odds that the EU gets its act sometime in the next year, which would enable the start of a recovery in 2014 and an acceleration in 2015?
That would seem to be equal to the odds of a strong UK economy, if no domestic growth drivers are available ~ in part because they are not there, and in part because those that are there requires the opposite of a Tory policy to take advantage of. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
The problem is that they might break out the explosives.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
Any increase in the perceived odds of an early election would decrease the perceived benefit of the "hang on and then rebuild in the wilderness" strategy. I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.
by DoDo - May 20 16 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 14 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2016 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1614 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 340 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments