The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
My argument is that as long as you don't overstretch on social progressivism, you will keep economic progressivism. Overstretch and you might well lose both. Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
Depending on what you mean by 'economic progressivism' we may well have lost that too.
But here is a thing - social progressivism isn't particularly about cash. It's about having a vision for the future.
Economic progressivism has no vision at all. It's about the next quarter, or occasionally about the next year.
If you limit your politics to economics, you have a car with an overheated engine, no brakes, and no steering wheel.
Perhaps this isn't an entirely good thing.
I'd suggest that the tragedy of Thatcher, Sarkozy, Merkel, Cameron, Blair and the rest, isn't just that they're clearly lying little shits and unpleasant people.
It's that they have no vision beyond strictly limited self-interest. They have no ability to plan for a more creative and enjoyable future.
Getting rid of the banks isn't going to be nearly enough. We need to find people with passion, imagination and intellect and put them in charge of things - not just to make things happen, but to make it possible for better things to happen.
At a guess we're not going to find those people among the usual suspects.
hardey ha..
if those 'unpleasant little shits' would move out of the middle of the road, we would be able to get somewhere better.
they're fifth columnists who open the town gates to the robbers without. The power of knowledge is in mortal combat with the knowledge of power. It really is that simple... That's the Edenic apple we are all munching on.
While I don't have proof at my fingertips either, at least I do have an example: the pirates in Germany get a very considerable share of working-class votes. And diffuse as they are, social conservatives they are not.
Unfortunately they don't get that immigration and job theft are always allowed because they lower wages.
So it's trivially easy for demagogues to encourage immigration for business, then turn it into a political issue at election time.
When the left/liberals go against the silent majority on social/cultural issues, it pushes the working classes into voting for the right and against their own economic interests. Why does this happen? Because the working classes of the West have become so wealthy since the war ended, that they now consider economic issues secondary to social and cultural ones.
- Jake If you only spend 20 minutes of the rest of your life on economics, go spend them here.
But more importantly, with the shift from full-employment policies to permanent-unemployment policies, the sack regained its power to compel obedience, and workers are not yet reduced to the sort of devil-may-care desperation required to effectively organize in that sort of environment. Unless current policies are reversed, they will be. But that will be then, and this is now.
by DoDo - May 23 40 comments
by Nomad - May 10 14 comments
by JakeS - May 15 7 comments
by Metatone - May 14 85 comments
by ARGeezer - May 16 15 comments
by gmoke - May 17 2 comments
by DoDo - May 12 11 comments
by Migeru - May 6 100 comments
by DoDo - May 2340 comments
by gmoke - May 172 comments
by ARGeezer - May 1615 comments
by JakeS - May 157 comments
by Metatone - May 1485 comments
by DoDo - May 1211 comments
by Nomad - May 1014 comments
by Migeru - May 78 comments
by marco - May 782 comments
by Migeru - May 6100 comments
by Ted Welch - May 35 comments
by afew - May 341 comments
by ceebs - May 26 comments
by gmoke - Apr 301 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 3067 comments
by joelado - Apr 2954 comments
by Metatone - Apr 2854 comments
by ATinNM - Apr 275 comments
by ceebs - Apr 265 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 2686 comments